Correlating Deep Learning-Based Automated Reference Kidney Histomorphometry with Patient Demographics and Creatinine

Background Reference histomorphometric data of healthy human kidneys are largely lacking due to laborious quantitation requirements. Correlating histomorphometric features with clinical parameters through machine learning approaches can provide valuable information about natural population variance. To this end, we leveraged deep learning, computational image analysis, and feature analysis to investigate the relationship of histomorphometry with patient age, sex, and serum creatinine (SCr) in a multinational set of reference kidney tissue sections. Methods A panoptic segmentation neural network was developed and used to segment viable and sclerotic glomeruli, cortical and medullary interstitia, tubules, and arteries/arterioles in the digitized images of 79 periodic acid-Schiff-stained human nephrectomy sections showing minimal pathologic changes. Simple morphometrics (e.g., area, radius, density) were quantified from the segmented classes. Regression analysis aided in determining the relationship of histomorphometric parameters with age, sex, and SCr. Results Our deep-learning model achieved high segmentation performance for all test compartments. The size and density of nephrons and arteries/arterioles varied significantly among healthy humans, with potentially large differences between geographically diverse patients. Nephron size was significantly dependent on SCr. Slight, albeit significant, differences in renal vasculature were observed between sexes. Glomerulosclerosis percentage increased, and cortical density of arteries/arterioles decreased, as a function of age. Conclusions Using deep learning, we automated precise measurements of kidney histomorphometric features. In the reference kidney tissue, several histomorphometric features demonstrated significant correlation to patient demographics and SCr. Deep learning tools can increase the efficiency and rigor of histomorphometric analysis. Significance statement Although the importance of kidney morphometry is well explored in disease contexts, the definition of variance in reference tissue is not. Advancements in digital and computational pathology have rendered quantitative analysis of unprecedented tissue volumes via the single press of a button. The authors leverage the unique benefits of panoptic segmentation to perform the largest ever quantitation of reference kidney morphometry. Regression analysis identified several kidney morphometric features that varied significantly with patient age and sex, and the results suggested that the set size of nephrons might depend more intricately on creatinine than previously thought.

[1]  Amber M. Worral,et al.  PodoSighter: A Cloud-Based Tool for Label-Free Podocyte Detection in Kidney Whole-Slide Images , 2021, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[2]  Brandon G. Ginley,et al.  Automated Computational Detection of Interstitial Fibrosis, Tubular Atrophy, and Glomerulosclerosis. , 2021, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[3]  Catherine P. Jayapandian,et al.  Development and evaluation of deep learning–based segmentation of histologic structures in the kidney cortex with multiple histologic stains , 2020, Kidney international.

[4]  Aydogan Ozcan,et al.  Deep learning-based transformation of H&E stained tissues into special stains , 2020, Nature Communications.

[5]  D. Chicco,et al.  The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation , 2020, BMC Genomics.

[6]  Rabi Yacoub,et al.  Computational Segmentation and Classification of Diabetic Glomerulosclerosis. , 2019, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[7]  Thomas J. Fuchs,et al.  Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[8]  Juho Kannala,et al.  Mask-RCNN and U-Net Ensembled for Nuclei Segmentation , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019).

[9]  Kaiming He,et al.  Panoptic Feature Pyramid Networks , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[10]  Jin Tae Kwak,et al.  Hover-Net: Simultaneous segmentation and classification of nuclei in multi-tissue histology images , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Richard J. Chen,et al.  Deep Adversarial Training for Multi-Organ Nuclei Segmentation in Histopathology Images , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Sanghoon Lee,et al.  The Digital Slide Archive: A Software Platform for Management, Integration, and Analysis of Histology for Cancer Research. , 2017, Cancer research.

[13]  A. Rule,et al.  Distinguishing age-related from disease-related glomerulosclerosis on kidney biopsy: the Aging Kidney Anatomy study. , 2015, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[14]  Richard A Armstrong,et al.  When to use the Bonferroni correction , 2014, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context , 2014, ECCV.

[16]  H. White,et al.  Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties☆ , 1985 .

[17]  Alvy Ray Smith,et al.  Color gamut transform pairs , 1978, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  Bart Smeets,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Histopathologic Assessment of Kidney Tissue. , 2019, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[19]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.