An evaluation of optimal sampling strategy and adaptive study design

We have evaluated the utility of optimal sampling strategy coupled with adaptive study design in the determination of individual patient and population pharmacokinetic parameter values. In 9 patients with cystic fibrosis receiving a short (1 minute) infusion of ceftazidime pharmacokinetic parameter values were determined with a nonlinear least‐squares estimator analyzing a traditional, geometrically spaced set of 12 postinfusion serum samples drawn over 8 hours. These values were compared with values generated from four sample subsets of the 12 obtained at optimal times and analyzed by nonlinear least‐squares estimator, as well as a maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian estimator with prior distributions placed on β and clearance. The four sampling times were determined according to an adaptive design optimization technique that employs sequential updating of population prior distributions on parameter values. Compared with the 12‐point determination, the four optimal points analyzed with the maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian estimator faithfully reproduced both microscopic and hybrid pharmacokinetic parameter values for individual patients and, consequently, also produced accurate measures of population central tendency and dispersion. This has important implications in being able to more efficiently derive target patient population pharmacokinetic information for new drugs. This should also allow generation of better concentration‐effect relationships in populations of interest.

[1]  J J DiStefano,et al.  Comprehensive kinetics of thyroxine distribution and metabolism in blood and tissue pools of the rat from only six blood samples: dominance of large, slowly exchanging tissue pools. , 1982, Endocrinology.

[2]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Minimal sampling schedules for identification of dynamic models of metabolic systems of clinical interest: case studies for two liver function tests , 1983 .

[3]  W. J. Westlake,et al.  Use of statistical methods in evaluation of in vivo performance of dosage forms. , 1973, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[4]  M. Spino,et al.  Ceftazidime disposition in acute and stable cystic fibrosis , 1984, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[5]  J J DiStefano,et al.  Optimized blood sampling protocols and sequential design of kinetic experiments. , 1981, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Stern,et al.  Ceftazidime therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis and multiply-drug-resistant pseudomonas. , 1985, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  T. Grasela,et al.  An evaluation of population pharmacokinetics in therapeutic trials. Part I. Comparison of methodologies , 1986, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[8]  Joseph J. DiStefano,et al.  Algorithms, software and sequential optimal sampling schedule designs for pharmacokinetic and physiologic experiments , 1982 .

[9]  A Schumitzky,et al.  A program package for simulation and parameter estimation in pharmacokinetic systems. , 1979, Computer programs in biomedicine.

[10]  G. Drusano,et al.  Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and moxalactam and their microbiological correlates in volunteers , 1984, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[11]  M D Reed,et al.  Ceftazidime in cystic fibrosis: pharmacokinetics and therapeutic response. , 1983, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[12]  J. DiStefano,et al.  Optimal nonuniform sampling interval and test-input design for identification of physiological systems from very limited data , 1979 .

[13]  J. Blumer,et al.  Determination of ceftazidime in biological fluids by using high-pressure liquid chromatography , 1983, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.