Ligand binding to proteins: The binding landscape model

Models of ligand binding are often based on four assumptions: (1) steric fit: that binding is determined mainly by shape complementarity; (2) native binding: that ligands mainly bind to native states; (3) locality: that ligands perturb protein structures mainly at the binding site; and (4) continuity: that small changes in ligand or protein structure lead to small changes in binding affinity. Using a generalization of the 2D HP lattice model, we study ligand binding and explore these assumptions. We first validate the model by showing that it reproduces typical binding behaviors. We observe ligand‐induced denaturation, ANS and heme‐like binding, and “lock‐and‐key” and “induced‐fit” specific binding behaviors characterized by Michaelis‐Menten or more cooperative types of binding isotherms. We then explore cases where the model predicts violations of the standard assumptions. For example, very different binding modes can result from two ligands of identical shape. Ligands can sometimes bind highly denatured states more tightly than native states and yet have Michaelis‐Menten isotherms. Even low‐population binding to denatured states can cause changes in global stability, hydrogen‐exchange rates, and thermal B‐factors, contrary to expectations, but in agreement with experiments. We conclude that ligand binding, similar to protein folding, may be better described in terms of energy landscapes than in terms of simpler mass‐action models.

[1]  B. Matthews,et al.  Specificity of ligand binding in a buried nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme: linkage of dynamics and structural plasticity. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[2]  M. Doyle,et al.  Molecular code for cooperativity in hemoglobin. , 1992, Science.

[3]  C. Woodward,et al.  Studies of hydrogen exchange in proteins. VI. Urea effects on ribonuclease exchange kinetics leading to a general model for hydrogen exchange from folded proteins. , 1971, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  D. Yee,et al.  Principles of protein folding — A perspective from simple exact models , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  N. Kallenbach,et al.  Hydrogen exchange and structural dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids , 1983, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[6]  J. Cherfils,et al.  Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a β-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 β-lactamase , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[7]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structure and dynamics of barnase complexed with 3'-GMP studied by NMR spectroscopy. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[8]  F. Richards.  Packing defects, cavities, volume fluctuations, and access to the interior of proteins. Including some general comments on surface area and protein structure , 1979 .

[9]  K. Dill,et al.  Solvent denaturation and stabilization of globular proteins. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[10]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Amide proton exchange in proteins by EX1 kinetics: studies of the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor at variable p2H and temperature. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[11]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  J. Markley,et al.  Hydrogen exchange in unligated and ligated staphylococcal nuclease. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[13]  K. Dill,et al.  Modeling the effects of mutations on the denatured states of proteins , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  D. Benjamin,et al.  Long-range changes in a protein antigen due to antigen-antibody interaction. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[15]  C. Woodward,et al.  Hydrogen exchange kinetics and internal motions in proteins and nucleic acids. , 1979, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[16]  K. Dill,et al.  Transition states and folding dynamics of proteins and heteropolymers , 1994 .

[17]  K A Dill,et al.  Local and nonlocal interactions in globular proteins and mechanisms of alcohol denaturation , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  D. Wemmer,et al.  Identification of a protein-binding surface by differential amide hydrogen-exchange measurements. Application to Bowman-Birk serine-protease inhibitor. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  F M Poulsen,et al.  Local perturbations by ligand binding of hydrogen deuterium exchange kinetics in a four-helix bundle protein, acyl coenzyme A binding protein (ACBP). , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  A. Fink,et al.  Protein conformational changes induced by 1,1'-bis(4-anilino-5-naphthalenesulfonic acid): preferential binding to the molten globule of DnaK. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[21]  Yawen Bai,et al.  Protein stability parameters measured by hydrogen exchange , 1994, Proteins.

[22]  K. Dill,et al.  Origins of structure in globular proteins. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  A. Kossiakoff.  Protein dynamics investigated by the neutron diffraction–hydrogen exchange technique , 1982, Nature.

[24]  K. Dill,et al.  A lattice statistical mechanics model of the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins , 1989 .

[25]  A. Hvidt,et al.  Hydrogen exchange in proteins. , 1966, Advances in protein chemistry.

[26]  C. Woodward,et al.  Hydrogen exchange rates in pancreatic trypsin inhibitor are not correlated to thermal stability in urea. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[27]  J. Wyman,et al.  Binding and Linkage: Functional Chemistry of Biological Macromolecules , 1990 .

[28]  H. Roder,et al.  An antibody binding site on cytochrome c defined by hydrogen exchange and two-dimensional NMR. , 1990, Science.

[29]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Structure-based discovery of inhibitors of thymidylate synthase. , 1993, Science.

[30]  P. Alexander,et al.  Hydrogen-deuterium exchange in the free and immunoglobulin G-bound protein G B-domain. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[31]  K. Dill,et al.  From Levinthal to pathways to funnels , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[32]  D. Ringe,et al.  Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[34]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[35]  D. Segal,et al.  The tritium-hydrogen exchange of myosin and its proteolytic fragments. , 1967, Biochemistry.

[36]  N. A. Rodionova,et al.  Study of the “molten globule” intermediate state in protein folding by a hydrophobic fluorescent probe , 1991, Biopolymers.

[37]  K. Dill,et al.  Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Regine Bohacek,et al.  Multiple Highly Diverse Structures Complementary to Enzyme Binding Sites: Results of Extensive Application of a de Novo Design Method Incorporating Combinatorial Growth , 1994 .

[39]  K. Dill,et al.  A statistical mechanical model for hydrogen exchange in globular proteins , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[40]  K. Dill,et al.  ‘‘Sequence space soup’’ of proteins and copolymers , 1991 .

[41]  O. Ptitsyn,et al.  Sequential mechanism of refolding of carbonic anhydrase B , 1987, FEBS letters.

[42]  A. Wlodawer,et al.  Hydrogen exchange in RNase A: neutron diffraction study. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  K. Dill.  Dominant forces in protein folding. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[44]  Karen N. Allen,et al.  An Experimental Approach to Mapping the Binding Surfaces of Crystalline Proteins , 1996 .

[45]  I. Kuntz.  Structure-Based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery , 1992, Science.

[46]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Molecular dynamics of hydrogen bonds in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor protein , 1981, Nature.