Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group.

OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency with which visual field abnormalities observed on follow-up visual fields for patients in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study were confirmed on retest. METHODS Between April 1, 1994, and March 1, 1999, 21,603 visual fields were obtained from 1637 patients in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. When follow-up visual fields are outside the normal limits on the Glaucoma Hemifield Test, the Corrected Pattern Standard Deviation (P<.05), or both, subsequent follow-up visual fields are monitored to confirm the abnormality. Abnormalities are confirmed if they are again abnormal on the Glaucoma Hemifield Test, the Corrected Pattern Standard Deviation, or both; if the defect is not artifactual; and if the same index and location are involved. Reliability criteria used by the study consisted of a limit of 33% for false positives, false negatives, and fixation losses. RESULTS Of the 21,603 regular follow-up visual fields, 1006 were follow-up retests performed because of an abnormality (n = 748) or unreliability (n = 258). We found that 703 (94%) of the 748 visual fields were abnormal and reliable, and 45 (6%) were abnormal and unreliable. On retesting, abnormalities were not confirmed for 604 (85.9%) of the 703 originally abnormal and reliable visual fields. CONCLUSIONS Most visual field abnormalities in patients in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study were not verified on retest. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities is essential for distinguishing reproducible visual field loss from long-term variability. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1187-1194

[1]  F. Fankhauser,et al.  Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Factors influencing short-term fluctuation. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  B C Chauhan,et al.  The psychometric function and reaction times of automated perimetry in normal and abnormal areas of the visual field in patients with glaucoma. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  H. H. Hunt,et al.  Threshold variability using different Goldmann stimulus sizes , 1990, Acta ophthalmologica.

[4]  J. Piltz,et al.  Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. , 1990, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Schaumberger,et al.  Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  G. Krieglstein,et al.  [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)]. , 1981, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[7]  J Katz,et al.  A longitudinal study of the age-adjusted variability of automated visual fields. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[9]  C A Johnson,et al.  Quality control functions of the Visual Field Reading Center (VFRC) for the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT). , 1993, Controlled clinical trials.

[10]  J Flammer,et al.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Starita,et al.  Total variance of serial Octopus visual fields in glaucomatous eyes , 1987 .

[12]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  J. D. Tompkins,et al.  Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  J. Katz,et al.  Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  M Schulzer,et al.  Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[16]  C. Johnson,et al.  Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  J. Lefante,et al.  Variability of high-pass resolution perimetry in normals and patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  D B Henson,et al.  Influence of fixation accuracy on threshold variability in patients with open angle glaucoma. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  J Caprioli,et al.  Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  D B Henson,et al.  Detecting progressive visual field loss. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  G. Lindgren,et al.  Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  A. Sommer,et al.  Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[23]  B Petrig,et al.  Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  M. Kass,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  E. Werner,et al.  Variability of static visual threshold responses in patients with elevated IOPs. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  J L Keltner,et al.  Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers. , 1986, Ophthalmology.

[27]  C A Johnson,et al.  Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  B. Becker,et al.  The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[29]  R P Mills,et al.  Does saving time using FASTPAC or suprathreshold testing reduce quality of visual fields? , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[30]  R. Goleminova.  [Changes in the visual field in glaucoma]. , 1957, Khirurgiia.

[31]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[32]  J L Keltner,et al.  Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[33]  G E Trope,et al.  Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[34]  P. Wishart,et al.  Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields. , 1995, Ophthalmology.