Beyond ideal MHD: towards a more realistic modelling of relativistic astrophysical plasmas

Many astrophysical processes involving magnetic fields and quasi-stationary processes are well described when assuming the fluid as a perfect conductor. For these systems, the idealmagnetohydrodynamics (MHD) description captures the dynamics effectively and a number of well-tested techniques exist for its numerical solution. Yet, there are several astrophysical processes involving magnetic fields which are highly dynamical and for which resistive effects can play an important role. The numerical modelling of such non-ideal MHD flows is significantly more challenging as the resistivity is expected to change of several orders of magnitude across the flow and the equations are then either of hyperbolic‐parabolic nature or hyperbolic with stiff terms. We here present a novel approach for the solution of these relativistic resistive MHD equations exploiting the properties of implicit‐explicit (IMEX) Runge‐Kutta methods. By examining a number of tests, we illustrate the accuracy of our approach under a variety of conditions and highlight its robustness when compared with alternative methods, such as the Strang splitting. Most importantly, we show that our approach allows one to treat, within a unified framework, those regions of the flow which are both fluid-pressure dominated (such as in the interior of compact objects) and instead magnetic-pressure dominated (such as in their magnetospheres). In view of this, the approach presented here could find a number of applications and serve as a first step towards a more realistic modelling of relativistic astrophysical plasmas.

[1]  Phillip Colella,et al.  An efficient solver for the equations of resistive MHD with spatially-varying resistivity , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Z. Etienne,et al.  General relativistic simulations of magnetized binary neutron star mergers , 2008, 0803.4193.

[3]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Relativistic Radiation Magnetohydrodynamics in Dynamical Spacetimes , 2008, 0802.3210.

[4]  C. Palenzuela,et al.  Magnetized neutron-star mergers and gravitational-wave signals. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[5]  S. Komissarov,et al.  Multi-dimensional Numerical Scheme for Resistive Relativistic MHD , 2007, 0708.0323.

[6]  C. Bona-Casas,et al.  Efficient implementation of finite volume methods in numerical relativity , 2007, 0706.1189.

[7]  O. Zanotti,et al.  ECHO: a Eulerian conservative high-order scheme for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics and magnetodynamics , 2007, 0704.3206.

[8]  P. K. Leung,et al.  Simulating the emission and outflows from accretion discs , 2007, astro-ph/0701778.

[9]  Department of Physics,et al.  WhiskyMHD: a new numerical code for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics , 2007, gr-qc/0701109.

[10]  S. Komissarov,et al.  Tearing instability in relativistic magnetically dominated plasmas , 2006, astro-ph/0606375.

[11]  Carol S. Woodward,et al.  A fully implicit numerical method for single-fluid resistive magnetohydrodynamics , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[12]  J. McKinney General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the jet formation and large-scale propagation from black hole accretion systems , 2006, astro-ph/0603045.

[13]  A. Mignone,et al.  An HLLC Riemann solver for relativistic flows – II. Magnetohydrodynamics , 2006, astro-ph/0601640.

[14]  J. McKinney General relativistic force-free electrodynamics: a new code and applications to black hole magnetospheres , 2006, astro-ph/0601410.

[15]  INFN,et al.  The exact solution of the Riemann problem in relativistic magnetohydrodynamics , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  E. Hirschmann,et al.  Relativistic MHD and excision: formulation and initial tests , 2005, gr-qc/0512147.

[17]  Y. Sekiguchi,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamics in full general relativity: Formulation and tests , 2005, astro-ph/0507383.

[18]  Santa Barbara,et al.  Cosmos++: Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics on Unstructured Grids with Local Adaptive Refinement , 2005, astro-ph/0509254.

[19]  Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in dynamical spacetimes: Numerical methods and tests , 2005, astro-ph/0503420.

[20]  J. Butcher Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations: Butcher/Numerical Methods , 2005 .

[21]  S. S. Komissarov,et al.  Electrodynamics of black hole magnetospheres , 2004, astro-ph/0402403.

[22]  Charles F. Gammie,et al.  HARM: A NUMERICAL SCHEME FOR GENERAL RELATIVISTIC MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS , 2003 .

[23]  J. Butcher Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations , 2003 .

[24]  P. Londrillo,et al.  An efficient shock-capturing central-type scheme for multidimensional relativistic flows. II. Magnetohydrodynamics , 2002 .

[25]  B. M. Lewis On Dead OH/IR Stars , 2002 .

[26]  A. V. Koldoba,et al.  Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Accretion to an Inclined Rotator: The “Cubed Sphere” Method , 2002, astro-ph/0209598.

[27]  Time‐dependent, force‐free, degenerate electrodynamics , 2002, astro-ph/0202447.

[28]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  A New Class of Optimal High-Order Strong-Stability-Preserving Time Discretization Methods , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[29]  C. Munz,et al.  Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the MHD equations , 2002 .

[30]  S. Komissarov Direct numerical simulations of the Blandford–Znajek effect , 2001 .

[31]  Lorenzo Pareschi,et al.  Central Differencing Based Numerical Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws with Relaxation Terms , 2001, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[32]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Strong Stability-Preserving High-Order Time Discretization Methods , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[33]  S. Komissarov Numerical simulations of relativistic magnetized jets , 1999 .

[34]  Kazunari Shibata,et al.  Relativistic Jet Formation from Black Hole Magnetized Accretion Disks: Method, Tests, and Applications of a General RelativisticMagnetohydrodynamic Numerical Code , 1999 .

[35]  S. Komissarov,et al.  A Godunov-type scheme for relativistic magnetohydrodynamics , 1999 .

[36]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  Implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations , 1997 .

[37]  J. A. Miralles,et al.  Numerical 3+1 General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics: A Local Characteristic Approach , 1997 .

[38]  Steven J. Ruuth,et al.  Implicit-explicit methods for time-dependent partial differential equations , 1995 .

[39]  C. D. Levermore,et al.  Hyperbolic conservation laws with stiff relaxation terms and entropy , 1994 .

[40]  L. Rezzolla,et al.  Classical and Quantum Gravity , 2002 .

[41]  B. Carter Convective variational approach to relativistic thermodynamics of dissipative fluids , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[42]  A. M. Anile Relativistic Fluids and Magneto-fluids: With Applications in Astrophysics and Plasma Physics , 1990 .

[43]  Angelo Marcello Anile,et al.  Relativistic fluids and magneto-fluids , 2005 .

[44]  D. Lambert Frontiers of stellar evolution , 1988 .

[45]  M. Brio,et al.  An upwind differencing scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics , 1988 .

[46]  J. Butcher The numerical analysis of ordinary differential equations: Runge-Kutta and general linear methods , 1987 .

[47]  W. Israel Nonstationary irreversible thermodynamics: A Causal relativistic theory , 1976 .

[48]  G. Strang On the Construction and Comparison of Difference Schemes , 1968 .

[49]  André Lichnerowicz,et al.  Relativistic Hydrodynamics And Magnetohydrodynamics , 1967 .

[50]  E. M. Lifshitz,et al.  Classical theory of fields , 1952 .

[51]  Eric F Darve,et al.  Author ' s personal copy A hybrid method for the parallel computation of Green ’ s functions , 2009 .