Simplified models of three-phase, five-limb transformer for studying GIC effects

Abstract The paper describes capabilities of a topological model of three-phase, five-limb transformer to accurately represent its response when subjected to geomagnetically induced currents. The model is validated by close agreement of the predicted values and waveforms of the currents, voltages, and reactive power with those measured in tests performed on two 400 MVA transformers connected back-to-back and to the Fingrid power network. Results demonstrate the importance of incorporating the network representation and dispel some misconceptions about the influence of the hysteretic properties of the core and tank in modeling five-limb transformers.

[1]  N. Takasu,et al.  An experimental analysis of DC excitation of transformers by geomagnetically induced currents , 1994 .

[2]  S. A. Khaparde,et al.  Transformer Engineering: Design and Practice , 2004 .

[3]  C. M. Arturi,et al.  Topology-Correct Reversible Transformer Model , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[4]  L. Bolduc,et al.  Saturation time of transformers under dc excitation , 2000 .

[5]  R. A. Walling,et al.  Characteristics of transformer exciting-current during geomagnetic disturbances , 1991 .

[6]  P. R. Price,et al.  Geomagnetically Induced Current Effects on Transformers , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[7]  S. Zirka,et al.  Towards a transformer transient model as a lumped-distributed parameter system , 2017 .

[8]  G. Buchgraber,et al.  Prediction of Magnetizing Current Wave-Forms in a Three-Phase Power Transformer Under DC Bias , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[9]  Sergey E. Zirka,et al.  Accounting for the Influence of the Tank Walls in the Zero-Sequence Topological Model of a Three-Phase, Three-Limb Transformer , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[10]  Nicola Chiesa,et al.  Practical Experience in Using a Topological Model of a Core-Type Three-Phase Transformer—No-Load and Inrush Conditions , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[11]  C.M. Arturi.  Transient Simulation and Analysis of Three-Phase Five-Limb Step-Up Transformer Following an Out-of-Phase Synchronization , 1991, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[12]  Afshin Rezaei-Zare,et al.  Analysis of Three-Phase Transformer Response due to GIC Using an Advanced Duality-Based Model , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  M. Lahtinen,et al.  GIC Occurrences and CIC Tests for 400 KV System Transformer , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[14]  S. S. Venkata,et al.  A three-phase three-winding core-type transformer model for low-frequency transient studies , 1997 .

[15]  Xiaoping Li,et al.  Analysis of Nonlinear Characteristics for a Three-Phase, Five-Limb Transformer Under DC Bias , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[16]  Nicola Chiesa,et al.  Implementation of Inverse Hysteresis Model Into EMTP—Part II: Dynamic Model , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[17]  Yilu Liu,et al.  Comparative analysis of exciting current harmonics and reactive power consumption from GIC saturated transformers , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[18]  Joydeep Mitra,et al.  Hybrid Transformer Model for Transient Simulation—Part I: Development and Parameters , 2007 .

[19]  Nasser Tleis,et al.  Power Systems Modelling and Fault Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2007 .