Dean-Stark vs FDS and KFT methods in moisture content recognition of transformers

Transformer is one of the crucial equipments in electric power network. Moisture in paper insulation acts as a catalyst in transformer insulation aging. Experience has shown that humidity will affect electrical strength of paper and pressboard as well as other insulation system materials by reducing degree of polymerization and accelerated aging. Thus, it is essential to determine the extent of moisture content within insulation system before exciting the transformer and also during normal operation. In this regard, chemical tests on oil have been carried out for many years. Also, electrical tests for assessing the transformer condition have been developed and improved in recent years while most introduced methods aim to extract moisture from transformer insulation system. In this study, the results of practically applicable methods in oil sampling (KFT and capacitance sensors), paper sampling (Dean-Stark method) and also dielectric response (RVM, PDC, FDS) are examined in determining insulation system humidity. Test results through various methods are compared to analyze the sensitivity of different approaches. Crucial practical recommendations as well as advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. At last, to recommend an accurate and reliable method for practical implementations, practical tests have been performed simultaneously on three distribution transformers and the results of them are discussed.

[1]  M. Bagheri,et al.  Impulse voltage distribution in intershield disk winding VS interleaved and continuous disk winding in power transformer , 2008, 2008 IEEE 2nd International Power and Energy Conference.

[2]  A. Hekmati,et al.  Influence of Electrostatic Shielding of Disc Winding on Increasing the Series Capacitance in Transformer , 2007, 2007 IEEE Lausanne Power Tech.

[3]  M. S. Naderi,et al.  Advanced transformer winding deformation diagnosis: moving from off-line to on-line , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[4]  M. Farzaneh,et al.  Dielectric spectroscopy techniques as quality control tool: a feasibility study , 2009, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine.

[5]  A. Setayeshmehr,et al.  Effect of temperature, water content and aging on the dielectric response of oil-impregnated paper , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Dielectric Liquids.

[6]  Mehdi Bagheri,et al.  Practical challenges in online transformer winding deformation diagnostics , 2011, 2011 2nd International Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems (EPECS).

[7]  M. S. Naderi,et al.  Transformer efficiency and de-rating evaluation with non-sinusoidal loads , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON).

[8]  C. Ekanayake,et al.  Application of Dielectric Spectroscopy Measurements for Estimating Moisture Content in Power Transformers , 2004 .

[9]  M. S. Naderi,et al.  FRA vs. short circuit impedance measurement in detection of mechanical defects within large power transformer , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation.

[10]  Stefan Tenbohlen,et al.  Comparing Various Moisture Determination Methods for Power Transformers , 2009 .

[11]  Frequency Response Analysis to recognize inductance variation in transformer due to internal short circuit , 2012, 2012 10th International Power & Energy Conference (IPEC).

[12]  M. S. Naderi,et al.  Frequency response analysis vs. flux division measurement in detection of transformer winding internal short circuit , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON).

[13]  Mehdi Bagheri,et al.  A case study on FRA capability in detection of mechanical defects within a 400MVA transformer , 2012 .