The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production

In this paper, we evaluate several theories of how syntactic/semantic structure influences the placement of intonational boundaries in language production (Cooper & Paccia-Cooper, 1980; Gee & Grosjean, 1983; Ferreira, 1988). Although the theories that we tested are shown to be quite successful, they are complex, and furthermore, they are incompatible with recent evidence for incrementality in sentence production. In light of these problems, we propose a simpler incremental model called the Left hand side/Right hand side Boundary hypothesis (LRB). According to this hypothesis, two factors that underlie the successful performance of the algorithms from the literature contribute to the likelihood of producing intonational boundaries at word boundaries: (1) the size of the recently completed syntactic constituent at a word boundary; and (2) the size of the upcoming syntactic constituent. These factors are further constrained by syntactic argument relationships. We demonstrate that the LRB performs as well as previous models with respect to the data from Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, we present evidence that the LRB outperforms previous models in certain instances. In Experiment 3, we demonstrate that the discourse status of relative clauses is an additional factor in intonational boundary placement.

[1]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing: evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognition.

[2]  S. Brennan,et al.  Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension , 2002 .

[4]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology , 2002, Speech Prosody 2002.

[5]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment , 2001 .

[6]  Merle Horne,et al.  Prosody: Theory and Experiment , 2000 .

[7]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[8]  P. J. Meijer,et al.  Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners' interpretations , 2000, Psychological research.

[9]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment , 1999 .

[10]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[11]  M. Kjelgaard,et al.  Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity , 1999 .

[12]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production : Verb-particle combinations , 1998 .

[13]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Learning To Parse? , 1998 .

[14]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Prosodic Units in Speech Production , 1997 .

[15]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[16]  V. Ferreira.  Is It Better to Give Than to Donate? Syntactic Flexibility in Language Production , 1996 .

[17]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  S R Speer,et al.  The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[19]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[20]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the tobi framework , 1994, ICSLP.

[21]  Eleonora Blaauw,et al.  The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech , 1994, Speech Commun..

[22]  F. Ferreira.  Creation of prosody during sentence production. , 1993, Psychological review.

[23]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication , 1992, Language.

[24]  Cheryl M. Beach,et al.  The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations☆ , 1991 .

[25]  F. Ferreira.  Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances , 1991 .

[26]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation , 1991, HLT.

[27]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse , 1990 .

[28]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses in English Conversation. , 1990 .

[29]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[30]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[31]  John W. Du Bois.  The Discourse Basis of Ergativity , 1987 .

[32]  Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al.  Opposite effects of accentuation and deaccentuation on verification latencies for given and new information , 1987 .

[33]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[34]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[35]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[36]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  I. Lehiste,et al.  Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences , 1975 .

[38]  D. Bolinger.  Accent Is Predictable (If You're a Mind-Reader) , 1972 .

[39]  J. Stanley,et al.  Improving Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis. , 1967 .

[40]  Prosodic Effects in Minimal Attachment , 2006 .

[41]  A. Schafer.  Running title : Prosodic influences in a conversation task 1 Prosodic influences on the production and comprehension of syntactic ambiguity in a game-based conversation task ∗ , 2004 .

[42]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context , 2003 .

[43]  Janet D. Fodor.  Prosodic disambiguation in silent deading , 2002 .

[44]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing , 2000 .

[45]  Markus Bader,et al.  Prosodic Influences on Reading Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences , 1998 .

[46]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Reanalysis in sentence processing , 1998 .

[47]  Cinzia Avesani,et al.  THE ROLE OF PROSODY IN DISAMBIGUATING POTENTIALLY AMBIGUOU S UTTERANCES IN ENGLISH AND ITALIAN , 1997 .

[48]  A. Schafer.  Prosodic parsing: The role of prosody in sentence comprehension , 1997 .

[49]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates , 1995 .

[50]  W. Levelt,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[51]  Maria Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Planning and timing in sentence production : the syntax-to-phonology conversion : a dissertation , 1988 .

[52]  Russell S. Tomlin,et al.  Coherence and Grounding in Discourse: Outcome of a Symposium, Eugene, Oregon, June 1984 , 1987 .

[53]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Syntax and speech , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[54]  W. Chafe.  Cognitive constraints on information flow , 1984 .

[55]  T. Givon.  Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[56]  T. Givón,et al.  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction , 1982 .

[57]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of given-new information , 1981 .

[58]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[59]  G. Stelmach.  Information processing in motor control and learning , 1978 .

[60]  W. Chafe.  Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .