Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS Previous studies at individual hospitals have reported differences in the use of major diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for women and men with coronary heart disease. To assess whether these differences can be generalized, we performed retrospective analyses of coronary angiography and revascularization (coronary-artery bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) in women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease in 1987, using abstract data on 49,623 discharges in Massachusetts and 33,159 discharges in Maryland. We used multiple logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds of the use of a procedure, controlling for principal diagnosis, age, secondary diagnosis of congestive heart failure or diabetes mellitus, race, and insurance status. RESULTS The adjusted odds of undergoing angiography were 28 percent and 15 percent higher for men than for women in Massachusetts and Maryland, respectively (95 percent confidence intervals for the odds ratios, 1.22 to 1.35 and 1.08 to 1.22). The respective adjusted odds of undergoing revascularization were 45 percent and 27 percent higher for men than for women (95 percent confidence intervals, 1.35 to 1.55 and 1.16 to 1.40). Because these differences could be related to differing thresholds for hospital admission, we performed a second analysis limited to patients with diagnosed acute myocardial infarction (11,865 discharges in Massachusetts and 6894 discharges in Maryland), a group in which all patients would be expected to receive hospital care. The male-to-female odds ratios in both states remained similar in magnitude and were statistically significant for angiography and revascularization. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate that women who are hospitalized for coronary heart disease undergo fewer major diagnostic and therapeutic procedures than men. These differences may represent appropriate levels of care for men and women, but it is also possible that they reflect underuse in women or overuse in men. Further study should assess the cause of these differences and their effect on patients' outcomes.

[1]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Women A Ten‐year Perspective , 1985, Annals of surgery.

[2]  P. Greenland,et al.  In-hospital and 1-year mortality in 1,524 women after myocardial infarction. Comparison with 4,315 men. , 1991, Circulation.

[3]  L. Melton,et al.  Coronary heart disease in residents of Rochester, Minnesota. VII. Incidence, 1950 through 1982. , 1986, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[4]  W. Rogers,et al.  Angiographic Prevalence of High‐risk Coronary Artery Disease in Patient Subsets (CASS) , 1981, Circulation.

[5]  N. Wenger.  Gender, coronary artery disease, and coronary bypass surgery. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[6]  S. Kelsey,et al.  Sex differences in early and long-term results of coronary angioplasty in the NHLBI PTCA Registry. , 1985, Circulation.

[7]  S. Wassertheil-Smoller,et al.  Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  E. Cook,et al.  Long-term survival of more than 2,000 patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  L I Iezzoni,et al.  Coding of acute myocardial infarction. Clinical and policy implications. , 1988, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  W. Kannel,et al.  Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. , 1986, American heart journal.

[11]  J. W. Kennedy,et al.  Association of sex, physical size, and operative mortality after coronary artery bypass in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). , 1982, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction in women: influence of gender on mortality and prognostic variables. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  R. Califf,et al.  Early discharge after acute myocardial infarction. , 1983, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  Steven S. Khan,et al.  Increased mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery: evidence for referral bias. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  R. Gillum.  Coronary artery bypass surgery and coronary angiography in the United States, 1979-1983. , 1987, American heart journal.

[16]  R. Brook,et al.  Predicting the appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and coronary angiography. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  T. N. Chirikos,et al.  Work disability from coronary heart disease in women. , 1984, Women & health.

[18]  C. Kjellstrand,et al.  Racial, sexual and age inequalities in chronic dialysis. , 1987, Nephron.

[19]  D G Ritter,et al.  Cardiac-catheterization and cardiac-surgical facilities: use, trends, and future requirements. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  H. Shimokawa,et al.  Endothelium‐Derived Relaxing Factor and Coronary Vasospasm , 1989, Circulation.

[21]  S. Willich,et al.  Effects of gender and race on prognosis after myocardial infarction: adverse prognosis for women, particularly black women. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Coronary artery surgery in women compared with men: analyses of risks and long-term results. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  R. Kronmal,et al.  Comparison of the long-term, postsurgical survival of women and men in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). , 1989, American heart journal.

[24]  M. Pauly,et al.  Access to Kidney Transplantation: Has the United States Eliminated Income and Racial Differences? , 1988 .

[25]  S. Johansson,et al.  Sex differences in cardioangiographic findings after myocardial infarction. , 1984, European heart journal.

[26]  R. Califf,et al.  Trends in physician management of uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, 1970 to 1987. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.