Predictive features of breast cancer on Mexican screening mammography patients

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer worldwide. In response, breast cancer screening programs are becoming common around the world and public programs now serve millions of women worldwide. These programs are expensive, requiring many specialized radiologists to examine all images. Nevertheless, there is a lack of trained radiologists in many countries as in Mexico, which is a barrier towards decreasing breast cancer mortality, pointing at the need of a triaging system that prioritizes high risk cases for prompt interpretation. Therefore we explored in an image database of Mexican patients whether high risk cases can be distinguished using image features. We collected a set of 200 digital screening mammography cases from a hospital in Mexico, and assigned low or high risk labels according to its BIRADS score. Breast tissue segmentation was performed using an automatic procedure. Image features were obtained considering only the segmented region on each view and comparing the bilateral di erences of the obtained features. Predictive combinations of features were chosen using a genetic algorithms based feature selection procedure. The best model found was able to classify low-risk and high-risk cases with an area under the ROC curve of 0.88 on a 150-fold cross-validation test. The features selected were associated to the differences of signal distribution and tissue shape on bilateral views. The model found can be used to automatically identify high risk cases and trigger the necessary measures to provide prompt treatment.

[1]  R. Warren,et al.  Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms , 1996, BMJ.

[2]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer With Mammography: Recent Advances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[3]  Kwan-Hoong Ng,et al.  Advances in Mammography Have Improved Early Detection of Breast Cancer , 2003 .

[4]  Ding Hui,et al.  Segmentation of the Breast Region in Mammograms Using Watershed Transformation , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[5]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  J. Frenk,et al.  Cáncer De Mama En México: Una Prioridad Apremiante (Breast Cancer in Mexico: An Urgent Priority) , 2009 .

[7]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[8]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Mammography , 2005 .

[9]  A. Kandaswamy,et al.  Breast Tissue Classification Using Statistical Feature Extraction Of Mammograms , 2006 .

[10]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Toward the detection of subtle signs , 2007, J. Frankl. Inst..

[11]  Francesco Falciani,et al.  GALGO: an R package for multivariate variable selection using genetic algorithms , 2006, Bioinform..

[12]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  AUTOMATED DETECTION OF MASSES IN MAMMOGRAMS , 2005 .

[13]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Gopal Karemore Computer aided breast cancer risk assessment using shape and texture of breast parenchyma in mammography , 2012 .

[16]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Data and text mining ROCR : visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005 .

[17]  Yianni Attikiouzel,et al.  Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Irini Reljin,et al.  Adaptation of multifractal analysis to segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 2006 .