Interoperable simulation gaming for strategic infrastructure systems design

Infrastructure systems are large physical networks of interrelated components which produce and distribute resources to meet societal needs. Meeting future sustainability objectives may require more complex systems with stronger integration across sectors and improved collaboration among constituent organizations. This dissertation introduces and demonstrates a method of interoperable simulation gaming to combine elements from concurrent engineering, wargaming, and serious gaming to support strategic design activities. First, a controlled human subjects experiment quantifies the relative impacts of technical and social sources of complexity using a simple surrogate design task, finding collaboration with communication barriers greatly increases the time and cost of design. Next, a modeling framework identifies common graph-theoretic structures and formal behavior definitions believed to be generalizable to all infrastructure systems. An interoperability interface defines interactions between system models to enable resource exchanges. Next, the High Level Architecture (HLA) standard is applied to the modeling framework to enable distributed, time-synchronized simulation with decentralized authority over constituent system models. A federation object model and agreement define data structures and processes to participate in a federated simulation execution. A prototype application case implements the modeling framework and simulation architecture using the context of Saudi Arabia. Infrastructure system models are developed for agriculture, water, petroleum, and electricity sectors. A baseline scenario develops system and element instantiations using historical estimates of resource flows and fictional costs. A software implementation provides a graphical user interface to modify design scenarios and visualize outcomes. Finally, a game formulation uses the prototype model as the basis of a simulation game with individual and collective objectives among water, energy, and agriculture ministry roles. Players collaboratively propose new infrastructure projects over a planning horizon to maximize objectives within time and budgetary constraints. A second controlled human subjects experiment studies the effect of three tool variants on outcome design quality, finding the number of data exchanges is positively correlated with outcome quality and an integrated simulation variant using the HLA results in more data exchanges compared to an asynchronous file-based variant. Thesis Supervisor: Olivier L. de Weck Title: Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems

[1]  P. Gleick Water and Energy , 1994 .

[2]  Sarah A. Sheard,et al.  7.3.1 A Complexity Typology for Systems Engineering , 2010 .

[3]  A E Drysdale,et al.  Life support approaches for Mars missions. , 2003, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[4]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms , 1999 .

[5]  William A. Owens,et al.  The Emerging U.S. System-of-Systems , 1996 .

[6]  W. E. Larson,et al.  NASA In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Project: Development and Implementation , 2008 .

[7]  G. Rabadi,et al.  System of systems engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Ray Ison,et al.  Human knowing and perceived complexity: Implications for systems practice , 2004 .

[9]  Kaushik Sinha,et al.  Structural complexity metric for engineered complex systems and its application , 2012 .

[10]  William H. J. Manthorpe The Emerging Joint System of Systems: A Systems Engineering Challenge and Opportunity for APL , 1996 .

[11]  Sam Nader,et al.  Paths to a low-carbon economy—The Masdar example , 2009 .

[12]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Empirical Framework for Characterizing Infrastructure Failure Interdependencies , 2007 .

[13]  E. W. Gholdston,et al.  The electric power system of the International Space Station-a platform for power technology development , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[14]  Stephen Lansing,et al.  Complex Adaptive Systems , 2003 .

[15]  Jan H. G. Klabbers,et al.  A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing , 2006 .

[16]  L. Anadón,et al.  THE WATER-ENERGY NEXUS IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA , 2011 .

[17]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  On the Systems Engineering and Management of Systems of Systems and Federations of Systems , 2001, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[18]  G Frizelle,et al.  Measuring complexity as an aid to developing operational strategy , 1995 .

[19]  Richard C. Oeftering The Impact of Flight Hardware Scavenging on Space Logistics , 2013 .

[20]  Moshe M. Barash,et al.  Complexity in manufacturing systems, Part 1: Analysis of static complexity , 1998 .

[21]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[22]  Federico Cugurullo,et al.  How to Build a Sandcastle: An Analysis of the Genesis and Development of Masdar City , 2013 .

[23]  K. Sridhar,et al.  In-situ resource utilization technologies for Mars life support systems. , 2000, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[24]  T. O’Rourke,et al.  Critical Infrastructure , Interdependencies , and Resilience , 2022 .

[25]  Mark W. Maier,et al.  Architecting Principles for Systems‐of‐Systems , 1996 .

[26]  Joshua B. McConnell,et al.  THE CONCEPT OF THE "CLIOS PROCESS": INTEGRATING THE STUDY OF PHYSICAL AND POLICY SYSTEMS USING MEXICO CITY AS AN EXAMPLE , 2004 .