Differential processing of melodic, rhythmic and simple tone deviations in musicians -an MEG study

Rhythm and melody are two basic characteristics of music. Performing musicians have to pay attention to both, and avoid errors in either aspect of their performance. To investigate the neural processes involved in detecting melodic and rhythmic errors from auditory input we tested musicians on both kinds of deviations in a mismatch negativity (MMN) design. We found that MMN responses to a rhythmic deviation occurred at shorter latencies than MMN responses to a melodic deviation. Beamformer source analysis showed that the melodic deviation activated superior temporal, inferior frontal and superior frontal areas whereas the activation pattern of the rhythmic deviation focused more strongly on inferior and superior parietal areas, in addition to superior temporal cortex. Activation in the supplementary motor area occurred for both types of deviations. We also recorded responses to similar pitch and tempo deviations in a simple, non-musical repetitive tone pattern. In this case, there was no latency difference between the MMNs and cortical activation was smaller and mostly limited to auditory cortex. The results suggest that prediction and error detection of musical stimuli in trained musicians involve a broad cortical network and that rhythmic and melodic errors are processed in partially different cortical streams.

[1]  A. Schnider,et al.  Receptive amusia: temporal auditory processing deficit in a professional musician following a left temporo-parietal lesion , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Musical Training Enhances Automatic Encoding of Melodic Contour and Interval Structure , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Ricarda Ines Schubotz,et al.  Prediction and Expectation , 2015 .

[4]  M. Kawato,et al.  Reorganization of Brain Activity for Multiple Internal Models After Short But Intensive Training , 2007, Cortex.

[5]  Armin Thron,et al.  Cortical activation patterns during complex motor tasks in piano players and control subjects. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Predictions and the brain: how musical sounds become rewarding , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  E. Saltzman,et al.  Action Representation of Sound: Audiomotor Recognition Network While Listening to Newly Acquired Actions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Lihua Mao,et al.  Attentional modulation of perceptual grouping in human visual cortex: ERP studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Laurel J. Trainor,et al.  Cortical Plasticity Induced by Short-Term Multimodal Musical Rhythm Training , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Neural networks engaged in milliseconds and seconds time processing: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation and patients with cortical or subcortical dysfunction , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Olaf Steinsträter,et al.  Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[13]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Y. Cohen,et al.  The what, where and how of auditory-object perception , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  L. Deouell The Frontal Generator of the Mismatch Negativity Revisited , 2007 .

[16]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Affective Privilege: Asymmetric Interference by Emotional Distracters , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[17]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Swinging in the brain: shared neural substrates for behaviors related to sequencing and music , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Olivier White,et al.  The Role of Left Supplementary Motor Area in Grip Force Scaling , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  C. Pantev,et al.  A Beamformer Analysis of MEG Data Reveals Frontal Generators of the Musically Elicited Mismatch Negativity , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  G. Nolte The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neuronal activity in the supplementary motor area of monkeys adapting to a new dynamic environment. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  R. Zatorre,et al.  ‘What’, ‘where’ and ‘how’ in auditory cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Psyche Loui,et al.  Effects of Practice and Experience on the Arcuate Fasciculus: Comparing Singers, Instrumentalists, and Non-Musicians , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[26]  Thomas Witzel,et al.  Linear constraint minimum variance beamformer functional magnetic resonance inverse imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. Bangert,et al.  Mapping perception to action in piano practice: a longitudinal DC-EEG study , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[28]  C. Pantev,et al.  Rhythmic and melodic deviations in musical sequences recruit different cortical areas for mismatch detection , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[30]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[31]  Claude Alain,et al.  Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans , 2004, NeuroImage.

[32]  J. Kaas,et al.  Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  C D Tesche,et al.  Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  S. Koelsch,et al.  Predictive information processing in music cognition. A critical review. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[35]  Elvira Brattico,et al.  Context Effects on Pitch Perception in Musicians and Nonmusicians: Evidence from Event-Related-Potential Recordings , 2001 .

[36]  Jonathan Hutchinson,et al.  What? When? And How? , 1890, The Hospital.

[37]  Sibylle C. Herholz,et al.  Cortical Plasticity Induced by Short-Term Unimodal and Multimodal Musical Training , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Peter Vuust,et al.  To musicians, the message is in the meter: Pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians , 2005, NeuroImage.

[39]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Melodic multi-feature paradigm reveals auditory profiles in music-sound encoding , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[40]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[41]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  A conceptual review on action-perception coupling in the musicians’ brain: what is it good for? , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[42]  E. Altenmüller,et al.  The musician's brain as a model of neuroplasticity , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  J. Kaas,et al.  Subdivisions of auditory cortex and ipsilateral cortical connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[45]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..