Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma.

PURPOSE To review the reliability of computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features in distinguishing lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS CT (n= 29) and MR (n = 40) images and radiographs (n = 28) of 60 patients with histologically verified fatty tumors (35 lipomas and 25 well-differentiated liposarcomas) were retrospectively reviewed in 31 females and 29 males (mean age, 56 years; age range, 1-88 years). Images were assessed for adipose tissue content, and non-fatty component was classified (thin and/or thick septa and nodular and/or globular components) as absent, mild, moderate, or pronounced. Also assessed were signal intensity and tissue attenuation of the fatty components and non-adipose elements. RESULTS Statistically significant imaging features favoring a diagnosis of liposarcoma included lesion larger than 10 cm (P <.001), presence of thick septa (P =.001), presence of globular and/or nodular non-adipose areas (P =.003) or masses (P =.001), and lesion less than 75% fat (P <.001). The most statistically significant radiologic predictors of malignancy were male sex, presence of thick septa, and associated non-adipose masses, which increased the likelihood of malignancy by 13-, nine-, and 32-fold, respectively. Both lipoma and liposarcoma demonstrated thin septa and regions of increased signal intensity on fluid-sensitive MR images. CONCLUSION A significant number of lipomas will have prominent non-adipose areas and will demonstrate an imaging appearance traditionally ascribed to well-differentiated liposarcoma. Features that suggest malignancy include increased patient age, large lesion size, presence of thick septa, presence of nodular and/or globular or non-adipose mass-like areas, and decreased percentage of fat composition.

[1]  R. Ehman,et al.  Value of MR imaging in differentiating benign from malignant soft-tissue masses: study of 95 lesions. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  R. Winkelmann,et al.  Atypical lipoma, atypical intramuscular lipoma, and well differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma. A reappraisal of 30 cases formerly classified as well differentiated liposarcoma , 1979, Cancer.

[3]  O. Myhre-Jensen A consecutive 7-year series of 1331 benign soft tissue tumours. Clinicopathologic data. Comparison with sarcomas. , 1981, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  A. Madaree,et al.  Membranous fat necrosis in lipomas. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[5]  Franz M. Enzinger,et al.  Soft Tissue Tumors , 1983 .

[6]  B. Shmookler,et al.  Liposarcoma of the extremities: MR and CT findings in the histologic subtypes. , 1993, Radiology.

[7]  F. S. Chew,et al.  Radionuclide imaging of lipoma and liposarcoma. , 1980, Radiology.

[8]  A. Rydholm,et al.  Size, site and clinical incidence of lipoma. Factors in the differential diagnosis of lipoma and sarcoma. , 1983, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[9]  R. Moser,et al.  Imaging of soft tissue tumors. , 1993, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[10]  P. Munk,et al.  Lipoma and liposarcoma: evaluation using CT and MR imaging. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  N. Gourtsoyiannis,et al.  The thickness of the renal parenchyma decreases with age: a CT study of 360 patients. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  S. Wallace,et al.  MR imaging of liposarcomas: correlation of MR features and histology. , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  C. H. Bush,et al.  Imaging of atypical lipomas of the extremities: Report of three cases , 2004, Skeletal Radiology.

[14]  S. Hukuda,et al.  MRI findings in intramuscular lipomas , 1999, Skeletal Radiology.