Simulating form and function of root systems: efficiency of nitrate uptake is dependent on root system architecture and the spatial and temporal variability of nitrate supply

Summary 1Root-system architecture, and plastic variation in architecture and physiological function, influence the capacity of plants to acquire nutrients from non-uniform soil. Previous theoretical analyses of the relationship between root architecture and nutrient acquisition have largely assumed uniform soils and unresponsive root systems. We extend these studies by considering non-uniform nutrient supply and plasticity in root growth and uptake physiology. 2Using modelling, we investigated the growth and nitrate uptake of two extreme theoretical architectural types: dichotomous (highly branched) and herringbone (sparsely branched). Root systems with plastic or non-plastic root-growth and nitrate-uptake responses, supplied with non-uniform distributions of soil nitrate, were simulated. 3The simulated herringbone root system had a higher nitrate-uptake efficiency (NUE, nitrate-N m−3 soil) when supply varied spatially and temporally (compared with variation in space alone), and NUE was affected only by the capacity to elevate uptake kinetics locally. In contrast, the efficiency of the dichotomous root system decreased under spatially and temporally dynamic nitrate supply (compared with static supply), and was influenced only by the capacity to proliferate roots in nitrate patches. 4These results suggest that root-system NUE is not solely a function of the ion-transport characteristics of soil, but is also influenced by the transitory nature of the nutrient source and the structure of the root system.

[1]  Alvin J. M. Smucker,et al.  Soil Environmental Modifications of Root Dynamics and Measurement , 1993 .

[2]  A. Diggle,et al.  Simulation of field data by a basic three-dimensional model of interactive root growth , 2002, Plant and Soil.

[3]  V. Dunbabin,et al.  Lupinus angustifolius has a plastic uptake response to heterogeneously supplied nitrate while Lupinus pilosus does not , 2001 .

[4]  D. Robinson,et al.  Variation, co-ordination and compensation in root systems in relation to soil variability , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[5]  B. Forde,et al.  An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. , 1998, Science.

[6]  V. Dunbabin,et al.  Is there an optimal root architecture for nitrate capture in leaching environments? , 2003, Plant, cell & environment.

[7]  G. Neumann,et al.  Root-induced changes in the availability of nutrients in the rhizosphere. , 2002 .

[8]  M. Tibbett.  Roots, foraging and the exploitation of soil nutrient patches: the role of mycorrhizal symbiosis , 2000 .

[9]  D. Robinson.  Optimal relations between root length and nutrient inflow rate in plant root systems , 1988 .

[10]  Gail W. T. Wilson,et al.  Architectural analysis of plant root systems 1. Architectural correlates of exploitation efficiency , 1991 .

[11]  A. Diggle,et al.  Modelling the interactions between water and nutrient uptake and root growth , 2002, Plant and Soil.

[12]  A. Fitter,et al.  The ecological significance of root system architecture: an economic approach. , 1991 .

[13]  D. Robinson.  The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[14]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Functional significance of root morphology and root system architecture , 1985 .

[15]  A. J. Diggle,et al.  ROOTMAP—a model in three-dimensional coordinates of the growth and structure of fibrous root systems , 1988, Plant and Soil.

[16]  R. L. Warner,et al.  Feedback Regulation of Nitrate Influx in Barley Roots by Nitrate, Nitrite, and Ammonium , 1993, Plant physiology.

[17]  J. P. Grime,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL PLASTICITY AND MINERAL NUTRIENT CAPTURE IN TWO HERBACEOUS SPECIES OF CONTRASTED ECOLOGY. , 1987, The New phytologist.

[18]  D. Robinson.  Resource Capture by Localized Root Proliferation: Why Do Plants Bother? , 1996 .

[19]  S. Asseng,et al.  Nitrogen and water flows under pasture–wheat and lupin–wheat rotations in deep sands in Western Australia. 1. Nitrogen fixation in legumes, net N mineralisation,and utilisation of soil-derived nitrogen , 1998 .

[20]  J. Lynch.  Root Architecture and Plant Productivity , 1995, Plant physiology.

[21]  D. Clarkson,et al.  Mineral nutrition: inducible and repressible nutrient transport systems. , 1991 .

[22]  A. Rovira,et al.  The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth , 1999 .

[23]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Architectural analysis of plant root systems 2. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species , 1991 .

[24]  R. Yanai,et al.  The Ecology of Root Lifespan , 1997 .

[25]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  NITROGEN AND WATER FLOWS UNDER PASTURE-WHEAT AND LUPIN-WHEAT ROTATIONS IN DEEP SANDS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA. 2. DRAINAGE AND NITRATE LEACHING , 1998 .

[26]  V. Dunbabin,et al.  The root growth response to heterogeneous nitrate supply differs for Lupinus angustifolius and Lupinus pilosus , 2001 .

[27]  D. Robinson,et al.  Root proliferation, nitrate inflow and their carbon costs during nitrogen capture by competing plants in patchy soil , 2001, Plant and Soil.

[28]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Architectural analysis of plant root systems , 1992 .

[29]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Integrating Resource Heterogeneity and Plant Plasticity: Modelling Nitrate and Phosphate Uptake in a Patchy Soil Environment , 1996 .