Predicting Drivers’ Eyes-Off-Road Duration in Different Driving Scenarios

Drivers consecutively direct their gaze to various areas to select relevant information from the traffic environment. The rate of crash risk increases with different off-road glance durations in different driving scenarios. This paper proposed an approach to identify current driving scenarios and predict driver’s eyes-off-road durations using Hidden Markov Model (HMM). A moving base driving simulator study with 26 participants driving in three driving scenarios (urban, rural, and motorway) was conducted. Three different fixed occlusion durations (0-s, 1-s, and 2-s) were applied to quantify eyes-off-road durations. Participants could initiate each occlusion for certain duration by pressing a microswitch on a finger. They were instructed to occlude their vision as often as possible while still driving safely. Drivers’ visual behavior and occlusion behavior were captured and analyzed based on manually frame by frame coding. Visual behaviors in terms of glance duration and glance location in time series were used as input to train HMMs. The results showed that current driving scenarios could be identified ideally using glance location sequences, the accuracy achieving up to 89.3%. And motorway was relatively distinguishable easily with over 90% accuracy. Moreover, HMM-based algorithms that fed up with both glance duration and glance location sequences resulted in a highest accuracy of 92.7% in driver’s eyes-off-road durations prediction. And higher accuracy achieved in longer eyes-off-road durations prediction. It indicates that time series of glance allocations could be used to predict driving behavior and indentify driving environment. The developed models in this study could contribute to the development of scenario sensitive visual inattention prewarning system.

[1]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The Impact of Distraction Mitigation Strategies on Driving Performance , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[2]  John D. Lee,et al.  Detection of Driver Distraction Using Vision-Based Algorithms , 2013 .

[3]  Hannu Karvonen,et al.  Context-sensitive distraction warnings - Effects on drivers' visual behavior and acceptance , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 48 th ANNUAL MEETING – 2004 FOCAL AND AMBIENT VISUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND DRIVER VISUAL SCANNING IN LANE KEEPING AND HAZARD DETECTION , 2004 .

[5]  Mauricio Muñoz,et al.  Distinguishing patterns in drivers’ visual attention allocation using Hidden Markov Models , 2016 .

[6]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[7]  John Krumm,et al.  A Markov Model for Driver Turn Prediction , 2008 .

[8]  William J Horrey,et al.  The Effects of Momentary Visual Disruption on Hazard Anticipation and Awareness in Driving , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Driver's lane keeping ability with eyes off road: Insights from a naturalistic study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Brett Browning,et al.  Learning to Predict Driver Route and Destination Intent , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[11]  Neil K Chaudhary,et al.  The influence of roadway situation, other contextual factors, and driver characteristics on the prevalence of driver secondary behaviors , 2016 .

[12]  Alex Fridman,et al.  What Can Be Predicted from Six Seconds of Driver Glances? , 2016, CHI.

[13]  Tuomo Kujala,et al.  The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Mauricio Muñoz,et al.  Exploring new qualitative methods to support a quantitative analysis of glance behavior , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[15]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Review of real-time visual driver distraction detection algorithms , 2010, MB '10.

[16]  William J Horrey,et al.  Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[17]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Driving context and visual-manual phone tasks influence glance behavior in naturalistic driving , 2014 .

[18]  J Engstroem,et al.  SafeTE final report , 2007 .

[19]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Attentional demand requirements of an automobile moving-map navigation system , 1989 .

[20]  Laban Källgren,et al.  What drives off-road glance durations during multitasking: capacity, practice or strategy? , 2013 .

[21]  John A. Michon,et al.  A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know , 1985 .

[22]  John D. Lee,et al.  How Dangerous Is Looking Away From the Road? Algorithms Predict Crash Risk From Glance Patterns in Naturalistic Driving , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Issues related to the driver distraction detection algorithm AttenD , 2009 .

[24]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study. , 2015, Journal of safety research.

[25]  Masamichi Shimosaka,et al.  Automobile Driving Behavior Recognition Using Boosting Sequential Labeling Method for Adaptive Driver Assistance Systems , 2008, KI.

[26]  Meng Lu,et al.  Driver Intention Recognition Method Using Continuous Hidden Markov Model , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..