Evaluation of a primary care-based collaborative care model (PARTNERS2) for people with diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar, or other psychoses: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Background Current NHS policy encourages an integrated approach to provision of mental and physical care for individuals with long term mental health problems. The ‘PARTNERS2’ complex intervention is designed to support individuals with psychosis in a primary care setting. Aim The trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the PARTNERS2 intervention. Design & setting This is a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial comparing collaborative care (PARTNERS2) with usual care, with an internal pilot to assess feasibility. The setting will be primary care within four trial recruitment areas: Birmingham & Solihull, Cornwall, Plymouth, and Somerset. GP practices are randomised 1:1 to either (a) the PARTNERS2 intervention plus modified standard care (‘intervention’); or (b) standard care only (‘control’). Method PARTNERS2 is a flexible, general practice-based, person-centred, coaching-based intervention aimed at addressing mental health, physical health, and social care needs. Two hundred eligible individuals from 39 GP practices are taking part. They were recruited through identification from secondary and primary care databases. The primary hypothesis is quality of life (QOL). Secondary outcomes include: mental wellbeing, time use, recovery, and process of physical care. A process evaluation will assess fidelity of intervention delivery, test hypothesised mechanisms of action, and look for unintended consequences. An economic evaluation will estimate its cost-effectiveness. Intervention delivery and follow-up have been modified during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion The overarching aim is to establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the model for adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar, or other types of psychoses.

[1]  T. Keeley,et al.  Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials—A qualitative study and modified Delphi , 2020, PloS one.

[2]  The PARTNERS2 writing collective Exploring patient and public involvement (PPI) and co-production approaches in mental health research: learning from the PARTNERS2 research programme , 2020, Research involvement and engagement.

[3]  S. Reilly,et al.  A worked example of initial theory-building: PARTNERS2 collaborative care for people who have experienced psychosis in England , 2019, Evaluation.

[4]  S. Reilly,et al.  Refining a model of collaborative care for people with a diagnosis of bipolar, schizophrenia or other psychoses in England: a qualitative formative evaluation , 2019, BMC Psychiatry.

[5]  David Moher,et al.  CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. , 2017, Annals of internal medicine.

[6]  Kleomenis Katevas,et al.  Effective patient–clinician interaction to improve treatment outcomes for patients with psychosis: a mixed-methods design , 2017 .

[7]  K. Lee,et al.  Korean translation of the CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials , 2014, Epidemiology and health.

[8]  Manuel Gomes,et al.  A Guide to Handling Missing Data in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Conducted Within Randomised Controlled Trials , 2014, PharmacoEconomics.

[9]  David Reeves,et al.  The Role of Primary Care in Service Provision for People with Severe Mental Illness in the United Kingdom , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  M. Slade,et al.  Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis , 2011, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[11]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  D. Anthony Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective , 2007 .

[13]  Ian R White,et al.  Adjusting for partially missing baseline measurements in randomized trials , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  G. Piaggio,et al.  Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Fadhel Kaboub Realistic Evaluation , 2004 .

[17]  S. Evans,et al.  Application and Results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (Mansa) , 1999, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[18]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. , 1996, The Milbank quarterly.

[19]  N. Black CONSORT , 1996, The Lancet.

[20]  L. Matthews,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions Draft of updated guidance , 2019 .