A possible explanation for rapid, large‐scale ionospheric responses to southward turnings of the IMF

We have examined the dayside high‐latitude convection response to a sudden southward turning of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) and found that the response is nearly instantaneous (<2 min) over a spatial region extending from ∼75° to 85° and from ∼9 to 16 MLT. Observations of the magnetic field were made with the WIND spacecraft in the solar wind and the GEOTAIL and IMP8 spacecraft in the magnetosheath. In the high‐latitude ionosphere, the HF radars of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) were used to monitor the convection. Based on the magnetosheath flow of the gas dynamic approximation, the field lines of the new IMF state were draped over a large portion of the dayside magnetopause when the first significant indication of convection response was measured in the ionosphere. Significant magnetic field line draping accompanied by extended reconnection on the dayside magnetopause may help explain the rapid, large‐scale response of ionospheric convection.

[1]  J. M. Ruohoniemi,et al.  Large-scale imaging of high-latitude convection with Super Dual Auroral Radar Network HF radar observations , 1998 .

[2]  R. Greenwald,et al.  The response of high‐latitude convection to a sudden southward IMF turning , 1998 .

[3]  M. Lester,et al.  SuperDARN studies of the ionospheric convection response to a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field , 1998 .

[4]  A. Ridley,et al.  A statistical study of the ionospheric convection response to changing interplanetary magnetic field conditions using the assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics technique , 1998 .

[5]  C. Senior,et al.  Super Dual Auroral Radar Network radar imaging of dayside high-latitude convection under northward interplanetary magnetic field : toward resolving the distorted two-cell versus multicell controversy , 1995 .

[6]  J. Slavin,et al.  Three‐dimensional position and shape of the bow shock and their variation with Alfvénic, sonic and magnetosonic Mach numbers and interplanetary magnetic field orientation , 1995 .

[7]  David G. Sibeck,et al.  Magnetopause shape as a bivariate function of interplanetary magnetic field Bz and solar wind dynamic pressure , 1993 .

[8]  M. Freeman,et al.  Dayside ionospheric convection changes in response to long‐period interplanetary Magnetic field oscillations: Determination of the ionospheric phase velocity , 1992 .

[9]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  Excitation and decay of solar-wind driven flows in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system , 1992 .

[10]  R. Greenwald,et al.  Simultaneous conjugate observations of dynamic variations in high‐latitude dayside convection due to changes in IMF By , 1990 .

[11]  M. Lockwood,et al.  The dependence of high-latitude dayside ionospheric flows on the North-South component of the IMF: a high time resolution correlation analysis using EISCAT polar and AMPTE UKS and IRM data , 1988 .

[12]  J. Spreiter,et al.  A new predictive model for determining solar wind-terrestrial planet interactions , 1980 .

[13]  A. Nishida,et al.  Two basic modes of interaction between the solar wind and the magnetosphere , 1971 .

[14]  A. Ridley,et al.  Ionospheric convection during nonsteady interplanetary magnetic field conditions , 1997 .

[15]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Eastward propagation of a plasma convection enhancement following a southward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field , 1986 .