Collecting kinematic data on a ski/snowboard track with panning, tilting, and zooming cameras: Is there sufficient accuracy for a biomechanical analysis?

Abstract For biomechanical research in several sports (e.g. skiing and snowboarding), field experiments are essential because these activities are performed over a great distance and in conditions that could not be reproduced in a controlled laboratory environment. High technical standards in kinematic set-up are necessary to achieve the required accuracy for biomechanical analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the kinematic data collected in a ski and snowboard field experiment. Eight tests generally used in laboratory settings were adapted to field conditions on a skiing slope to determine the error related to motion capture. The calculated photogrammetric errors in the x-, y-, and z-direction were 11 mm, 9 mm, and 13 mm, respectively. The maximum error caused by soft tissue artifacts was 39 mm. These results indicate that accuracy of kinematic data in the described field experiment was comparable to that found in literature for laboratory experiments. It may be concluded that accurate kinematic data collection for skiing and snowboarding can be performed in a field setting and that these results are accurate enough to serve as input data for further analyses.

[1]  Volker Drenk PHOTOGRAMMETRIC EVALUATION PROCEDURES FOR PANNABLE AND TILTABLE CAMERAS OF VARlABLE FOCAL LENGTH , 1994 .

[2]  J G Hay,et al.  Three-dimensional videography of swimming with panning periscopes. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[4]  John W. Chow,et al.  A Panning Videographic Technique to Obtain Selected Kinematic Characteristics of the Strides in Sprint Hurdling , 1993 .

[5]  W. Taylor,et al.  A survey of formal methods for determining the centre of rotation of ball joints. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Roger Bartlett,et al.  Movement variability cannot be determined reliably from no-marker conditions. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Christian Raschner,et al.  Carving turns versus traditional parallel turns - a comparative biomechanical analysis , 2000 .

[9]  A. Burstein Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System. 3rd ed. , 2001 .

[10]  Maurice R. Yeadon A Method for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Data on Ski Jumping Using Pan and Tilt Cameras , 1989 .

[11]  Shinji Miyazaki,et al.  Comparison of the performance of 3D camera systems , 1995 .

[12]  L. Chen,et al.  An investigation on the accuracy of three-dimensional space reconstruction using the direct linear transformation technique. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  B. Nigg,et al.  Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system , 1995 .

[14]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  J. Challis,et al.  Accuracy assessment and control point configuration when using the DLT for photogrammetry. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Dany Lafontaine,et al.  3-D Kinematics Using Moving Cameras. Part 1: Development and Validation of the Mobile Data Acquisition System , 2003 .

[17]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  H. M. Karara,et al.  Direct Linear Transformation from Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates in Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2015 .

[19]  Stefan Lindinger Biomechanische Analysen von Skatingtechniken im Skilanglauf , 2005 .

[20]  John H. Challis,et al.  A Procedure for the Automatic Determination of Filter Cutoff Frequency for the Processing of Biomechanical Data , 1999 .

[21]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[23]  A. Nevill,et al.  Validity and measurement agreement in sports performance. , 1996, Journal of sports sciences.

[24]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[25]  A. Nevill,et al.  Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. , 1997, British journal of sports medicine.

[26]  Jesús Dapena,et al.  Comparison of Film and Video Techniques for Estimating Three-Dimensional Coordinates within a Large Field , 1992 .

[27]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[28]  T J Koh,et al.  A panning DLT procedure for three-dimensional videography. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  U. Della Croce,et al.  A spot check for estimating stereophotogrammetric errors , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.