Learning by Computer Simulation Does Not Lead to Better Test Performance on Advanced Cardiac Life Support Than Textbook Study.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. M. Garfield,et al. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer simulation of anaesthetic uptake and distribution as a teaching tool , 1989, Medical education.
[2] M. Sridharan,et al. Computer-assisted learning compared with weekly seminars for teaching fundamental electrocardiography to junior medical students. , 1988, Southern medical journal.
[3] D M D'Alessandro,et al. Longitudinal follow-up comparison of educational interventions: multimedia textbook, traditional lecture, and printed textbook. , 1997, Academic radiology.
[4] H. Schwid,et al. The Anesthesia Simulator-Recorder: a device to train and evaluate anesthesiologists' responses to critical incidents. , 1990, Anesthesiology.
[5] R. Kitz,et al. Teaching Effectiveness: Evaluation of Computer‐Assisted Instruction for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , 1975, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[6] W. V. van Meurs,et al. A Comparison of Traditional Textbook and Interactive Computer Learning of Neuromuscular Block , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[7] H. Schwid,et al. Use of a computerized advanced cardiac life support simulator improves retention of advanced cardiac life support guidelines better than a textbook review. , 1999, Critical care medicine.