Where Do Agricultural Producers Get Safety and Health Information?

ABSTRACT There is little empirical guidance regarding communication sources and channels used and trusted by agricultural producers. The goal of this study was to characterize frequency of use and levels of trust in agricultural safety and health information sources and channels accessed by agricultural producers. A sample of 195 agricultural producers was surveyed at county fairs in Iowa. Information was collected about the frequency of use and level of trust in 14 information sources and channels. Associations between age, gender, and education level and use and trust of each information source or channel were estimated using logistic regression. The sample consisted of 72% men with a mean age of 50.1 (SD = 15.6) years. Newspaper and magazine articles were the most commonly used agricultural safety and health information source or channel; 77% (n = 140) of respondents reporting using them at least monthly. Among those reporting monthly or more frequent use, 75% reported trusting mostly or completely, compared with 58% using and 49% trusting the Internet. High levels of use and trust of newspaper and magazine articles did not vary significantly by age, gender, or education level. Age in the highest tertile (57–83 years) was marginally associated with lower odds of using, as well as using and trusting, all the information sources and channels studied except for medical clinics (use only: odds ratio [OR], 3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79–15.64; use and trust: OR, 5.90, 95% CI, 0.91–38.42). These findings suggest that traditional media may be more effective than digital media for delivering agricultural safety and health information to agricultural producers. Medical clinics may be an untapped venue for communicating with older agricultural producers.

[1]  D L Helitzer,et al.  Culturally relevant model program to prevent and reduce agricultural injuries. , 2014, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[2]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Evaluation of an intervention to reduce musculoskeletal hazards among fresh market vegetable growers. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  H P Cole,et al.  Stories or statistics? Farmers' attitudes toward messages in an agricultural safety campaign. , 2002, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[4]  M. Lum,et al.  Use of Health Communication and Social Marketing Principles in Planning Occupational Safety and Health Interventions , 2008 .

[5]  P. Elkind,et al.  Theater as a mechanism for increasing farm health and safety knowledge. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[6]  B. Karsh,et al.  The Use and Value of Information Systems as Evaluated by Dairy and Specialty Crop Farm Managers , 2009, Journal of agromedicine.

[7]  L J Chapman,et al.  Evaluation of an occupational injury intervention among Wisconsin dairy farmers. , 2003, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[8]  Charles V. Schwab,et al.  Safe Farm: The Impact of an Iowa Public Information Campaign , 1997 .

[9]  M. Emmelin,et al.  Encouraging the installation of rollover protective structures in New York State: the design of a social marketing intervention , 2008, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[10]  K. Hall,et al.  Influence of subjective norms and communication preferences on grain farmers’ attitudes toward organic and non-organic farming , 2010 .

[11]  William A. Kandel Profile of Hired Farmworkers, A 2008 Update , 2012 .

[12]  Susan Westneat,et al.  The transtheoretical model of change in adolescents: implications for injury prevention. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[13]  W. Pickett,et al.  Evaluation of an enhanced approach to the dissemination of the North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, Preventive medicine.