The (in)validity of sensitivity and specificity.

This paper is a legacy of the first author, and after her untimely death reconstructed by the second author as a tribute to Irene Guggenmoos's contribution to biostatistics. It discusses two different views on diagnostic testing: the classical view in which sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test are considered universal constants, and the more statistical point of view that focuses on predictive values. The differences between the two paradigms are outlined and practical examples are discussed to show that the familiar concepts of sensitivity and specificity must be handled with care and not used indiscriminately.

[1]  D. Haynor,et al.  The Clinical Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neuroimaging , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  A P Dawid,et al.  Properties of diagnostic data distributions. , 1976, Biometrics.

[3]  C B Begg,et al.  Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. , 1987, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  M. Taylor,et al.  A critique of the St. Louis psychiatric research criteria for schizophrenia. , 1975, The American journal of psychiatry.

[5]  S. Walter,et al.  Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. , 1980, Biometrics.

[6]  M A Young,et al.  Operational Definitions of Schizophrenia What Do They Identify? , 1982, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[7]  D L Kent,et al.  Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[8]  R S LEDLEY,et al.  Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason. , 1959, Science.

[9]  J. Houwing-Duistermaat,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests in acute maxillary sinusitis determined by maximum likelihood in the absence of an external standard. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  F. Harrell,et al.  Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariable analysis. , 1984, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  D. Berwick,et al.  Do physicians have a bias toward action? A classic study revisited. , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  Impact on management of new diagnostic tests in Alzheimer's disease , 1996, The Lancet.

[13]  I. Guggenmoos‐Holzmann,et al.  Kappa-like indices of observer agreement viewed from a latent class perspective. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Foundations of medical diagnosis: what actually are the parameters involved in Bayes' theorem? , 1994, Statistics in medicine.