The LABY Microworld

The LABY microworld, a functional simulation of Air Traffic Control (ATC), captures the underlying processes involved in electronic air traffic management with a simplified version of the operational human-machine interface. LABY is a computer-based human-in-the-loop dynamic environment whereby a controller must issue directional commands to guide aircraft along a predetermined route, while avoiding potential conflicts and dealing concurrently with other incoming information. It can be used for human factors research or system engineering purposes, or configured specifically for use with expert controllers for the training of non-technical skills in ATC. We present a use case of LABY, comparing the efficiency of input devices for ATC: Input times using the mouse were quicker than with the stylus, but error was not greater. We discuss the potential of LABY for system engineering, training and research purposes.

[1]  Jean-Paul Imbert,et al.  LABY: Un support d'aide à l'évaluation de choix de conception d'IHM pour le contrôle aérien , 2012, Ergo'IHM.

[2]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  Microworlds for experimental research: Having your (control and collection) cake, and realism too , 1998 .

[4]  Jean-Paul Imbert,et al.  Attentional costs and failures in air traffic control notifications , 2014, Ergonomics.

[5]  B. Brehmer,et al.  Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study , 1993 .

[6]  Daniel Lafond,et al.  Dealing With Task Interruptions in Complex Dynamic Environments , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[7]  S. Tremblay,et al.  Inattentional Deafness in Simulated Air Traffic Control Tasks:A Behavioral and P300 Analysis , 2014 .

[8]  Wayne D. Gray.  Simulated task environments: The role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and laboratory tasks in basic and applied cognitive research. , 2002 .

[9]  J. Cellier,et al.  Effet d'une décorrélation visuo-motrice sur le mouvement de pointage , 2009 .

[10]  B. Brehmer.  Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Daniel Lafond,et al.  Supporting situation awareness: A tradeoff between benefits and overhead , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[12]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Background Sound Impairs Interruption Recovery in Dynamic Task Situations: Procedural Conflict? , 2014 .

[13]  Jean-François Gagnon,et al.  Capturing the task model of experts in emergency response using SYnRGY , 2012, ISCRAM.

[14]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[15]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Mickaël Causse,et al.  Evaluation of head-free eye tracking as an input device for air traffic control , 2013, Ergonomics.

[17]  Jean-François Gagnon,et al.  Assessment and refinement of an intelligent tutor for complex decision making , 2012, CogSci.

[18]  Daniel Lafond,et al.  Decision Analysis Using Policy Capturing and Process Tracing Techniques in a Simulated Naval Air-Defense Task , 2009 .