Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation performance: roles of strategic HRM and technical turbulence

This study advances research on the return from entrepreneurial orientation by examining how a firm's internal system (i.e. strategic human resource management) and the external environment (i.e. technical turbulence) within which a firm operates interact in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and product innovation performance. Using a matched sample of 151 chief executive officers and other top executives from Chinese manufacturing firms, this study finds that entrepreneurial orientation is positively related to product innovation performance and that this relationship is stronger among firms implementing strategic HRM practices to a greater extent. Furthermore, the three-way interaction test indicates that the interactive effect of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic HRM practices on product innovation performance is stronger for firms operating in a less turbulent environment.

[1]  F. Damanpour Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[2]  Nilesh Saraf,et al.  IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Sunghoon Kim,et al.  Human resource management and firm performance in China: A critical review , 2010 .

[4]  J. Covin Entrepreneurial Versus Conservative Firms: A Comparison of Strategies and Performance , 1991 .

[5]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  A contextual examination of new venture performance: entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism , 2007 .

[6]  Lynda Gratton,et al.  Strategic human resource management: a conceptual approach , 1994 .

[7]  Li-Qun Wei,et al.  The impact of market orientation and strategic HRM on firm performance: the case of Chinese enterprises , 2008 .

[8]  G. Bruton,et al.  Asian Management Research: Status Today and Future Outlook , 2008 .

[9]  N. Herndon,et al.  SHRM and product innovation: testing the moderating effects of organizational culture and structure in Chinese firms , 2011 .

[10]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[11]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  VISIONARY LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1989 .

[12]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[13]  T. Huang,et al.  The Strategic Level of Human Resource Management and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 1998 .

[14]  Hean Tat Keh,et al.  The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs , 2007 .

[15]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[17]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[18]  P. Wright,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management , 1992 .

[19]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms , 1983 .

[20]  P. Ghemawat,et al.  Organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency, The , 1993 .

[21]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation , 2001 .

[22]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  A High Performance Work Practices Taxonomy , 2013 .

[23]  C. Chou,et al.  The curvilinear relationships between responsive and proactive market orientations and new product performance: A contingent link , 2008 .

[24]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[25]  A. Yusuf ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY, THE ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION OF BUSINESS VENTURES AND PERFORMANCE , 2002 .

[26]  Debi S. Saini,et al.  (How) Does the HR strategy support an innovation oriented business strategy? An investigation of institutional context and organizational practices in Indian firms , 2010 .

[27]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Job Perception–Job Satisfaction Relations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Competing Theories , 1993 .

[28]  John G. Michel,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION POSTURE AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM CHARACTERISTICS , 1992 .

[29]  T. Elfring,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and New Venture Performance: The Moderating Role of Intra- And Extraindustry Social Capital , 2008 .

[30]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: Evidence from China , 2008 .

[31]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[32]  Dirk De Clercq,et al.  The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship , 2010 .

[33]  K. Zhou Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China , 2006 .

[34]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES: KNOWLEDGE-BASED RESOURCES, ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES , 2003 .

[35]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[36]  O. Ferrell,et al.  The effect of market orientation on product innovation , 2000 .

[37]  G. Hult,et al.  Does market orientation matter?: a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance , 2001 .

[38]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[39]  Mark A. Huselid The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[40]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[41]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[42]  Chun Hui,et al.  Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: investigating generalizability and instrumentality. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  J. Pennings,et al.  Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures , 2001 .

[44]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[45]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Strategic human capital management in SMEs: An empirical study of entrepreneurial performance , 2003 .

[46]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[47]  Detelin S. Elenkov,et al.  Organizational capacity for change and environmental performance: an empirical assessment of Bulgarian firms , 2005 .

[48]  Choonwoo Lee,et al.  Internal capabilities, external linkages, and performance. A study on technology-based ventures , 2001 .

[49]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses , 2003 .

[50]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation , 2001 .

[51]  Hai Guo,et al.  Incentive Mechanisms, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Technology Commercialization: Evidence from China's Transitional Economy , 2007 .

[52]  Jake G. Messersmith,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in young firms: The role of human resource management , 2013 .