Facilitating Collaborative Ontology-Based Annotations in Communities of Interest

If an automated system is tasked to provide services such as search or clustering of information on an information repository, the quality of the output depends a lot on the information that is available to the system in machine-readable form. Simple text, for example, is machine-readable only in a very limited sense. Advanced services typically need to derive other representations of the text (e.g., sets of keywords) as input for their core algorithms. Some services might need information that cannot be derived from the resource in question alone, but is available as separate metadata only, such as usage information. Annotations can be used to carry this information. This thesis focuses on so-called ontology-based annotations. In contrast to other forms of annotations such as Tags (arbitrary strings that users can assign to resources), ontology-based annotations conform to a predefined data structure and class hierarchy. An advantage of this approach is that rich information can be stored in a well-structured way in the annotations; a drawback is that users need to be familiar with the hierarchy and other design decisions of the underlying ontology used for annotations. Two scenarios are considered in this thesis: First, a document-based scenario in which text annotations are used to represent both information about the text content and usage and user context information in a multi-user setting with mostly objective annotation criteria; second, a resource-based scenario whose annotation model focuses on multi-user settings with subjective annotation criteria, using (dis-)similarities in user annotations to derive user similarity metrics, and building personalized views from this information. Finally, the prototypical systems that have been developed throughout this thesis get evaluated, proving the concepts presented in this thesis.