Optimal digital filters for analyzing the mid-latency auditory P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer’s disease

BACKGROUND Filtering is an effective pre-processing technique for improving the signal-to-noise ratio of ERP waveforms. Filters can, however, introduce substantial distortions into the time-domain representations of ERP waveforms. Inappropriate filter parameters may lead to the presence of statistically significant but artificial effects, whereas true effects may appear as insignificant. NEW METHOD The present study aimed to determine the optimal digital filters for analyzing the auditory P50 component in patients with Alzheimer's disease. To provide evidence of the optimal filter settings, different high-pass and low-pass filters were applied to ERP waveforms obtained from a conditioning-testing paradigm. The results facilitate practical recommendations for selection of filters that maximize the signal-to-noise ratio of the P50 components without introducing significant distortions. RESULTS The present study confirms that filter parameters have a significant effect on the amplitude and gating measures of the P50 component. Setting the high-pass cut-off at 0.1Hz and the low-pass cut-off at 90Hz (or above) is recommended for P50 component analyses. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS The majority of ERP studies on sensory gating report using high-pass filters with 10-Hz cut-offs to measure P50 suppression. Such a high cut-off appeared to induce significant distortions into the ERP waveforms; thus, the authors advise against using these excessive high-pass cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS Filtering broadband signals, such as ERP signals, necessary results in time-domain distortions. However, by adjusting the filter parameters carefully according to the components of interest, it is possible to minimize filter artifacts and obtain more easily interpretable ERP waveforms.

[1]  J. Simpson,et al.  SPASTICITY: MECHANISM, MEASUREMENT, MANAGEMENT , 1970 .

[2]  P. Davies,et al.  Bandpass filter settings differentially affect measurement of P50 sensory gating in children and adults , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Fein,et al.  P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations , 1992, Biological Psychiatry.

[4]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[5]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  G A Miller,et al.  Digital filtering: background and tutorial for psychophysiologists. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[7]  F. Jessen,et al.  Sensory gating deficit expressed by a disturbed suppression of the P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer's disease. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[8]  S. Bachmann,et al.  Age effects on preattentive and early attentive auditory processing of redundant stimuli: is sensory gating affected by physiological aging? , 2011, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[9]  Rafal Bogacz,et al.  Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[10]  David A. Smith,et al.  Reliability of P50 auditory event-related potential indices of sensory gating. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[11]  B. Ally,et al.  Sensory Gating in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease and Their Biological Children , 2007, American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.

[12]  Nash N. Boutros,et al.  P50 sensory gating ratios in schizophrenics and controls: A review and data analysis , 2008, Psychiatry Research.

[13]  S. Luck,et al.  How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Oleg Korzyukov,et al.  Sensory gating deficits during the mid-latency phase of information processing in medicated schizophrenia patients , 2004, Psychiatry Research.

[15]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  Paolo Bergonzi,et al.  Sensory Gating Deficit Assessed by P50/Pb Middle Latency Event Related Potential in Alzheimer’s Disease , 2006, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[17]  D L Braff,et al.  Sensorimotor gating and schizophrenia. Human and animal model studies. , 1990, Archives of general psychiatry.

[18]  Robert Freedman,et al.  Elementary neuronal dysfunctions in schizophrenia , 1991, Schizophrenia Research.

[19]  R Freedman,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia. , 1982, Biological psychiatry.

[20]  D. Braff,et al.  The “incredible shrinking” P50 event-related potential , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[21]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[22]  L. J. Bour,et al.  A meta-analysis of P50 studies in patients with schizophrenia and relatives: Differences in methodology between research groups , 2007, Schizophrenia Research.

[23]  Thomas Grunwald,et al.  Neuronal substrates of sensory gating within the human brain , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[24]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  A. Toyomaki,et al.  Different P50 sensory gating measures reflect different cognitive dysfunctions in schizophrenia , 2015, Schizophrenia Research: Cognition.

[26]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications , 2005 .

[27]  A. Belger,et al.  Midlatency evoked potentials attenuation and augmentation reflect different aspects of sensory gating , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[28]  M. Kisley,et al.  Comparison of sensory gating to mismatch negativity and self-reported perceptual phenomena in healthy adults. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Gregory A. Miller,et al.  Digital filtering in EEG/ERP analysis: Some technical and empirical comparisons , 1998 .

[30]  D L Braff,et al.  Human and animal studies of schizophrenia-related gating deficits , 1999, Current psychiatry reports.

[31]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Does Filtering Preclude Us from Studying ERP Time-Courses? , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[32]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  Four Common Conceptual Fallacies in Mapping the Time Course of Recognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[33]  Andre Rupp,et al.  P50 gating deficit in Alzheimer dementia correlates to frontal neuropsychological function , 2010, Neurobiology of Aging.

[34]  J S Buchwald,et al.  Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential abnormality of P1 in Alzheimer's disease. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: A Computer-Based Approach , 1997 .

[36]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Filter Effects and Filter Artifacts in the Analysis of Electrophysiological Data , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[37]  B. Friedman,et al.  P50 sensory gating and attentional performance. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[38]  The Effects of Vigilance and Visual Distraction on the P50 Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potential , 2015 .

[39]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Determining the initial states in forward-backward filtering , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[40]  T. W. Parks,et al.  Digital Filter Design , 1987 .

[41]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  Ulrich Faigle,et al.  Sensory gating revisited: Relation between brain oscillations and auditory evoked potentials in schizophrenia , 2008, Schizophrenia Research.

[43]  Partha P. Mitra,et al.  Observed Brain Dynamics , 2007 .

[44]  G. Fein,et al.  The auditory P50 response is normal in Alzheimer's disease when measured via a paired click paradigm. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  B. Rosen,et al.  The associations between 40 Hz-EEG and the middle latency response of the auditory evoked potential. , 1987, The International journal of neuroscience.

[46]  Jaeseung Jeong.  EEG dynamics in patients with Alzheimer's disease , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  R Freedman,et al.  Selection of digital filtering parameters and P50 amplitude. , 1998, Biological psychiatry.