The Biometric Menagerie - A Fuzzy and Inconsistent Concept

This paper proves that in iris recognition, the concepts of sheep, goats, lambs and wolves - as proposed by Doddington and Yager in the so-called Biometric Menagerie, are at most fuzzy and at least not quite well defined. They depend not only on the users or on their biometric templates, but also on the parameters that calibrate the iris recognition system. This paper shows that, in the case of iris recognition, the extensions of these concepts have very unsharp and unstable (non-stationary) boundaries. The membership of a user to these categories is more often expressed as a degree (as a fuzzy value) rather than as a crisp value. Moreover, they are defined by fuzzy Sugeno rules instead of classical (crisp) definitions. For these reasons, we said that the Biometric Menagerie proposed by Doddington and Yager could be at most a fuzzy concept of biometry, but even this status is conditioned by improving its definition. All of these facts are confirmed experimentally in a series of 12 exhaustive iris recognition tests undertaken for University of Bath Iris Image Database while using three different iris code dimensions (256x16, 128x8 and 64x4), two different iris texture encoders (Log Gabor and Haar Hilbert) and two different types of safety models.

[1]  Valentina E. Balas,et al.  AI challenges in iris recognition. processing tools for bath iris image database , 2010, ICIA 2010.

[2]  Neil Yager,et al.  The Biometric Menagerie , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Jnos Fodor,et al.  New Concepts and Applications in Soft Computing , 2013, New Concepts and Applications in Soft Computing.

[4]  Valentina Emilia Balas,et al.  8-valent fuzzy logic for iris recognition and biometry , 2011, 2011 5th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics (ISCIII).

[5]  Valentina Emilia Balas,et al.  Combined Haar-Hilbert and Log-Gabor Based Iris Encoders , 2012, New Concepts and Applications in Soft Computing.

[6]  Nicolaie Popescu-Bodorin,et al.  Exploring New Directions in Iris Recognition , 2009, SYNASC.

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Toward extended fuzzy logic - A first step , 2009, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A New Direction in AI: Toward a Computational Theory of Perceptions , 2001, AI Mag..

[9]  Valentina Emilia Balas,et al.  Iris codes classification using discriminant and witness directions , 2011, 2011 5th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics (ISCIII).

[10]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling , 1993, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[11]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  On the consistency of the biometric menagerie for irises and iris matchers , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security.

[12]  Valentina Emilia Balas,et al.  Comparing Haar-Hilbert and Log-Gabor based iris encoders on Bath Iris Image Database , 2010, 4th International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications.