Estimation of mechanical properties of articular cartilage with MRI - dGEMRIC, T2 and T1 imaging in different species with variable stages of maturation.

BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most potential methods for non-invasive diagnosis of cartilage disorders. Several methods have been established for clinical use; T(1) relaxation time imaging with negatively charged contrast agent (delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage, dGEMRIC) has been shown to be sensitive to proteoglycan (PG) content while T(2) relaxation time has been demonstrated to express properties of the collagen fibril network. The use of native T(1) relaxation time has received less attention. OBJECTIVE In the present study, magnetic resonance (MR) parameters of different types of patellar cartilage were studied with respect to the mechanical properties of the tissue. The general usefulness of the parameters to predict mechanical properties was investigated using cartilage from different species and stages of maturation. METHODS dGEMRIC, T(2) and native T(1) relaxation times of healthy mature human, juvenile porcine and juvenile bovine articular cartilage samples were measured at 9.4T at 25 degrees C. Mechanical properties (Young's modulus and dynamic modulus) of the samples were measured in unconfined compression using a material testing device. The relationships between MRI and mechanical parameters and potential differences between different types of tissues were tested statistically. RESULTS Significant, but varying relationships were established between T(1) or T(2) relaxation time and mechanical properties, depending on tissue type. The values of mechanical parameters were in line with the results previously reported in the literature. Unexpectedly, dGEMRIC showed no statistically significant association with the mechanical properties. Variation in the assumption of native T(1) value did not induce significant differences in the calculated contrast agent concentration, and consequently did not affect prediction of mechanical properties. CONCLUSION For patellae, a complex variation in the relationships between T(2) and mechanical properties in different groups was revealed. The results support the conclusion that juvenile animal tissue, exhibiting a highly complex collagenous architecture, may not always serve as a realistic model for mature human tissue with a typical three-zone network organization, and other than bulk metrics are required for the analysis of cartilage T(2). As the multilayered collagen network can strongly control the mechanical characteristics of juvenile tissue, it may mask the mechanical role of PGs and explain why dGEMRIC could not predict mechanical parameters in patellar cartilage.

[1]  P Leander,et al.  Gd‐DTPA2–‐enhanced MRI of femoral knee cartilage: A dose‐response study in healthy volunteers , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  M S Laasanen,et al.  T(2) relaxation time mapping reveals age- and species-related diversity of collagen network architecture in articular cartilage. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  Albert C. Chen,et al.  Depth‐dependent confined compression modulus of full‐thickness bovine articular cartilage , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  D. McKeag,et al.  Estimating the severity of osteoarthritis with magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1992, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  V J Schmithorst,et al.  MR imaging and T2 mapping of femoral cartilage: in vivo determination of the magic angle effect. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Spatial assessment of articular cartilage proteoglycans with Gd‐DTPA‐enhanced T1 imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  V. Mow,et al.  Chondrocyte deformation and local tissue strain in articular cartilage: A confocal microscopy study , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  J. Arokoski,et al.  Articular cartilage thickness and glycosaminoglycan distribution in the young canine knee joint after remobilization of the immobilized limb , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Deborah Burstein,et al.  Relaxivity and diffusion of gadolinium agents in cartilage , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  W. Bae,et al.  Three-dimensional (3-D) imaging of chondrocytes in articular cartilage: growth-associated changes in cell organization. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[11]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  Functional adaptation of articular cartilage from birth to maturity under the influence of loading: a biomechanical analysis. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[12]  Jennifer S Wayne,et al.  MR imaging of normal and matrix-depleted cartilage: correlation with biomechanical function and biochemical composition. , 2003, Radiology.

[13]  H. Imhof,et al.  The role of relaxation times in monitoring proteoglycan depletion in articular cartilage , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  M S Laasanen,et al.  Proteoglycan and collagen sensitive MRI evaluation of normal and degenerated articular cartilage , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Ruaud,et al.  Effect of proteoglycan depletion on T2 mapping in rat patellar cartilage. , 2005, Radiology.

[16]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Prediction of biomechanical properties of articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Effects of collagen orientation on MR imaging characteristics of bovine articular cartilage. , 1993, Radiology.

[18]  C C Glüer,et al.  Evaluation of water content by spatially resolved transverse relaxation times of human articular cartilage. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  J Silvennoinen,et al.  Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage , 2000, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[20]  D. Burstein,et al.  Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Takayuki Obata,et al.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR to determine glycosaminoglycan concentration in reparative cartilage after autologous chondrocyte implantation: preliminary results. , 2006, Radiology.

[22]  T J Mosher,et al.  Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2--preliminary findings at 3 T. , 2000, Radiology.

[23]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 characteristics of human knee articular cartilage: Topographical variation and relationships to mechanical properties , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Y. Xia,et al.  Quantitative in situ correlation between microscopic MRI and polarized light microscopy studies of articular cartilage. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[25]  Yang Xia,et al.  Imaging the physical and morphological properties of a multi‐zone young articular cartilage at microscopic resolution , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  J Silvennoinen,et al.  T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: A comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  M S Laasanen,et al.  T2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: Relationships with tissue mechanical properties , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  Van,et al.  Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. , 1997, Radiology.

[29]  V. Jellús,et al.  Correlation between biochemical composition and magnetic resonance appearance of articular cartilage. , 1998, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[30]  C Lemaire,et al.  Osteoarthritis in rhesus macaque knee joint: quantitative magnetic resonance imaging tissue characterization of articular cartilage. , 1995, The Journal of rheumatology.

[31]  Wilson C. Hayes,et al.  Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics , 1995 .

[32]  Won C Bae,et al.  Depth-varying Density and Organization of Chondrocytes in Immature and Mature Bovine Articular Cartilage Assessed by 3D Imaging and Analysis , 2005, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[33]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[34]  H. J. Mankin,et al.  Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Articular Cartilage. Part II: Degeneration and Osteoarthrosis, Repair, Regeneration, and Transplantation*† , 1997 .

[35]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Partial restoration of immobilization‐induced softening of canine articular cartilage after remobilization of the knee (stifle) joint , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[36]  Y. Xia,et al.  Characteristics of topographical heterogeneity of articular cartilage over the joint surface of a humeral head. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[37]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Speed of sound in normal and degenerated bovine articular cartilage. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[38]  Hisham A Alhadlaq,et al.  Orientational dependence of T2 relaxation in articular cartilage: A microscopic MRI (μMRI) study , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  Bruce C. Po,et al.  Glycosaminoglycan distribution in cartilage as determined by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): potential clinical applications. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  D. Burstein,et al.  Is MRI fulfilling its promise for molecular imaging of cartilage in arthritis? , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[41]  Van C. Mow,et al.  Structure and function of articular cartilage and meniscus , 2005 .

[42]  G. Guillot,et al.  T2 mapping of rat patellar cartilage. , 2001, Radiology.

[43]  R. Appleyard,et al.  Topographical analysis of the structural, biochemical and dynamic biomechanical properties of cartilage in an ovine model of osteoarthritis. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[44]  D. Burstein,et al.  Gd‐DTPA2− as a measure of cartilage degradation , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  Deborah Burstein,et al.  Spatially‐localized correlation of dGEMRIC‐measured GAG distribution and mechanical stiffness in the human tibial plateau , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[46]  D. Burstein,et al.  Monitoring glycosaminoglycan replenishment in cartilage explants with gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.