Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.

BACKGROUND A recommendation for short-interval follow-up of "probably benign finding" is associated with up to 11% of screening mammograms, but its predictive value for breast cancer is unclear. We examined the predictive values (i.e., the percentage of women with a diagnosis of breast cancer 2 years after a short-interval follow-up recommendation) and likelihood ratios (derived from the pretest and post-test odds of breast cancer in the Women's Health Initiative sample) for breast cancer that are associated with a recommendation for short-interval follow-up among postmenopausal women. METHODS We performed a longitudinal analysis of a prospective cohort of 68 126 postmenopausal women (aged 50-79 years) who were participating in clinical trials as part of the Women's Health Initiative at 40 centers across the United States. Eligible participants had screening mammograms at baseline and at least 2 years of follow-up that included a repeat mammography. Outcomes measured were breast cancer events at 1 and 2 years after baseline and the results of subsequent mammograms. All P values were two-sided. RESULTS A total of 2927 (5%) of the 58 408 eligible women had baseline mammograms that included recommendations for short-interval follow-up. The incidence of breast cancer for women with a short-interval follow-up recommendation was 1.0% at 2 years after the baseline mammogram compared with breast cancer incidences of 0.6% and 0.5% for women whose baseline mammograms were described as "benign" and "negative," respectively. Across the 40 participating centers, the prevalence of short-interval follow-up recommendations among baseline mammograms varied from 1.2% to 9.8% (P<.001), even when the analysis was adjusted for key variables in regression models. Centers reporting higher frequencies of such recommendations did not have lower positive predictive values for breast cancer than centers reporting lower frequencies. The likelihood ratio for breast cancer after a recommendation for short-interval follow-up on a subsequent mammogram was 2.20 (95% confidence interval = 1.65 to 2.86). CONCLUSION Having a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up was associated with a low positive predictive value for breast cancer among postmenopausal women during a 2-year follow-up. This result suggests that the current criteria for this recommendation-repeat mammography within 6 months-should be reconsidered.

[1]  R. Demicheli,et al.  Premenopausal Status Accelerates Relapse in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Hypothesis Links Angiogenesis, Screening Controversy , 2001, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[2]  S. Woolf,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  Mark B Dignan,et al.  Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  James O. Berger,et al.  Intervals for Posttest Probabilities: A Comparison of 5 Methods , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  R. Demicheli,et al.  Breast cancer screening for women aged 40-49 years: screening may not be the benign process usually thought. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  M. Lacquement,et al.  Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  S. Orel,et al.  BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. , 1999, Radiology.

[8]  M. Nadel,et al.  Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested". , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  JoAnn E. Manson,et al.  Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[10]  J. Austoker,et al.  Breast Screening: Adverse Psychological Consequences One Month after Placing Women on Early Recall Because of a Diagnostic Uncertainty. A Multicentre Study , 1997, Journal of medical screening.

[11]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. , 1996, JAMA.

[12]  E A Sickles,et al.  Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  V. Velanovich Immediate biopsy versus observation for abnormal findings on mammograms: an analysis of potential outcomes and costs. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[14]  X. Varas,et al.  Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[15]  E. Sickles Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. , 1991, Radiology.

[16]  G. Samsa,et al.  Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  A. Huggins,et al.  Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years , 1990, The Lancet.

[18]  D. Cyrlak,et al.  Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography. , 1988, Radiology.

[19]  F. Hall,et al.  Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. , 1988, Radiology.

[20]  W. Weissert Estimating the long-term care population: Prevalence rates and selected characteristics , 1985, Health care financing review.