Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species

Detailed restriction analyses of many samples often require substantial amounts of time and effort for DNA extraction, restriction digests, Southern blotting, and hybridization. We describe a novel approach that uses the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for rapid simplified restriction typing and mapping of DNA from many different isolates. DNA fragments up to 2 kilobase pairs in length were efficiently amplified from crude DNA samples of several pathogenic Cryptococcus species, including C. neoformans, C. albidus, C. laurentii, and C. uniguttulatus. Digestion and electrophoresis of the PCR products by using frequent-cutting restriction enzymes produced complex restriction phenotypes (fingerprints) that were often unique for each strain or species. We used the PCR to amplify and analyze restriction pattern variation within three major portions of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats from these fungi. Detailed mapping of many restriction sites within the rDNA locus was determined by fingerprint analysis of progressively larger PCR fragments sharing a common primer site at one end. As judged by PCR fingerprints, the rDNA of 19 C. neoformans isolates showed no variation for four restriction enzymes that we surveyed. Other Cryptococcus spp. showed varying levels of restriction pattern variation within their rDNAs and were shown to be genetically distinct from C. neoformans. The PCR primers used in this study have also been successfully applied for amplification of rDNAs from other pathogenic and nonpathogenic fungi, including Candida spp., and ought to have wide applicability for clinical detection and other studies.

[1]  A. Lambowitz,et al.  Classification of Histoplasma capsulatum isolates by restriction fragment polymorphisms , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  M. Nei,et al.  Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Henry A. Erlich,et al.  Amplification and analysis of DNA sequences in single human sperm and diploid cells , 1988, Nature.

[4]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[5]  P. T. Magee,et al.  Separation of chromosomes of Cryptococcus neoformans by pulsed field gel electrophoresis , 1989, Infection and immunity.

[6]  P. T. Magee,et al.  Strain and species identification by restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the ribosomal DNA repeat of Candida species , 1987, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  S. Kwok,et al.  Avoiding false positives with PCR , 1989, Nature.

[8]  S. Straus,et al.  Genetic Relatedness of Filobasidiella neoformans (Cryptococcus neoformans) and Filobasidiella bacillispora (Cryptococcus bacillisporus) as Determined by Deoxyribonucleic Acid Base Composition and Sequence Homology Studies , 1981 .

[9]  K. Mullis,et al.  Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. , 1988, Science.

[10]  Steven B. Lee Isolation of DNA from fungal mycelia and single spores , 1990 .

[11]  T. White Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics , 1990 .

[12]  T. Bruns,et al.  Amplification and sequencing of DNA from fungal herbarium specimens. , 1990 .

[13]  A. Barbour,et al.  Cloning of 18S and 25S rDNAs from the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  K. Kwon-Chung A new genus, filobasidiella, the perfect state of Cryptococcus neoformans. , 1975, Mycologia.