Retinal slip during active head motion and stimulus motion

Gaze control in various conditions is important, since retinal slip deteriorates the perception of 3-D shape of visual stimuli. Several studies have shown that visual perception of 3-D shape is better for actively moving observers than for passive observers watching a moving object. However, it is not clear to what extent the improved percept of 3-D shape for active observers has to be attributed to corollary discharges to higher visual centers or whether the improved percept might be due to improved gaze stabilization during active head movements. The aim of this study was to measure binocular eye movements and to make a quantitative comparison of retinal slip for subjects instructed to fixate a visual stimulus in an active condition (subject makes an active head movement, object is stationary) and in a passive condition (the stimulus moves, the subject is stationary) for various movement frequencies, viewing distances, and stimulus diameters. Retinal slip remains below the “acuity threshold” of about 4 deg/s in active conditions, except for the highest frequency tested in this study (1.5 Hz) for nearby targets (0.25 cm). Retinal slip exceeds this threshold for most passive conditions. These results suggest that the enhanced performance in the visual perception of 3-D shape during active head movements can, at least partly, be explained by better fixation by actively moving observers.

[1]  G D Paige,et al.  Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Demer,et al.  Human gaze stabilization during natural activities: translation, rotation, magnification, and target distance effects. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Gielen,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional shape from ego- and object-motion: Comparison between small- and large-field stimuli , 1995, Vision Research.

[4]  B J Hess,et al.  Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[6]  J. Droulez,et al.  The visual perception of three-dimensional shape from self-motion and object-motion , 1994, Vision Research.

[7]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  W. A. van de Grind,et al.  Non-visual information in structure-from-motion. , 1996, Vision research.

[9]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Donders' law in torticollis. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Context compensation in the vestibuloocular reflex during active head rotations. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Off-centric rotation axes in natural head movements: implications for vestibular reafference and kinematic redundancy. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  G R Barnes,et al.  The effects of visual discrimination of image movement across the stationary retina. , 1981, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  G. Barnes,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in the control of head and eye movement: The role of visual feedback and predictive mechanisms , 1993, Progress in neurobiology.

[14]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration , 1999, Nature.

[15]  V Honrubia,et al.  Dynamic visual acuity: a test for oscillopsia and vestibulo-ocular reflex function. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[16]  C. Busettini,et al.  A role for stereoscopic depth cues in the rapid visual stabilization of the eyes , 1996, Nature.

[17]  C. Gielen,et al.  Are the Orientations of the Head and Arm Related During Pointing Movements? , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  T. Raphan,et al.  Effect of viewing distance on the generation of vertical eye movements during locomotion , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  M. Braunstein Depth perception in rotating dot patterns: effects of numerosity and perspective. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Human gaze stabilization during active head translations. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  W. P. Huebner,et al.  Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Postural responses to stationary and moving scenes as a function of distance to the scene , 1992 .

[23]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[24]  W. J. V. Damme,et al.  Non-visual Information in Structure-from-motion , 1996, Vision Research.

[25]  G D Paige,et al.  Characteristics of the VOR in Response to Linear Acceleration , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.