Construct validity and test-retest reliability of a free mobile application for spatio-temporal gait analysis in Parkinson's disease patients.

BACKGROUND Mobile applications may be used to assess gait pattern deviation through mobile smartphones in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, few studies have investigated their psychometrics properties. RESEARCH QUESTION To study the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the RUNZI® free mobile application in people with mild to moderate PD. METHODS Thirty individuals were evaluated with the RUNZI® app and with the 10-meter walking test (10 MW), simultaneously. In addition, the Timed Up & Go test (TUG), Tinetti scale, and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were used to study the construct validity. Also, test-retest reliability of the mobile for spatio-temporal gait parameters was explored. RESULTS The correlation indices of the 10 MW test with the RUNZI® app at fast speeds was moderate to excellent (r = .588-.957). At a comfortable speed, the correlation was excellent for walking speed (r = 0.944), moderate for steps (r = 0.780) and stride length (r = 0.760), and poor for cadence (r = .424). Results showed significant correlations between TUG and spatio-temporal gait parameters at fast and comfortable speeds. There were no significant correlations or consistent associations between Tinetti and BBS and RUNZI®. The test-retest reliability was good to excellent for parameters measured with the RUNZI®. SIGNIFICANCE Our findings highlight specific opportunities for a free smartphone-based spatio-temporal gait analysis to serve as a complement to conventional gait analysis methods in clinical practice with a moderate to excellent construct validity with the 10 MW test and good to excellent test-retest reliability in PD patients.

[1]  Emma Phillips,et al.  Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of dementia in clinically unevaluated people aged 65 and over in community and primary care populations. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  M. Watson.  Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people , 1992 .

[3]  A. Thompson,et al.  Evaluating neurological outcome measures : the bare essentials , 2022 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  R. C. L. Cuerda,et al.  Mobile phone applications in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review. , 2017, Neurologia.

[6]  Manuela Galli,et al.  The Parkinsonian Gait Spatiotemporal Parameters Quantified by a Single Inertial Sensor before and after Automated Mechanical Peripheral Stimulation Treatment , 2015, Parkinson's disease.

[7]  M. Morris,et al.  Reliability of measurements obtained with the Timed "Up & Go" test in people with Parkinson disease. , 2001, Physical therapy.

[8]  Taylor Chomiak,et al.  A new quantitative method for evaluating freezing of gait and dual-attention task deficits in Parkinson’s disease , 2015, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[9]  D. Thurman,et al.  Evidence-based Review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the Practice Parameter: Assessing Patients in a Neurology Practice for Risk of Falls (an , 2022 .

[10]  Sandra K. Kostyk,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for Individuals With Parkinson Disease , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[11]  S. Haley,et al.  Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[12]  E. Andresen,et al.  Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  T. Steffen,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change on Balance and Ambulation Tests, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale in People With Parkinsonism , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[14]  Suchi Saria,et al.  Using Smartphones and Machine Learning to Quantify Parkinson Disease Severity: The Mobile Parkinson Disease Score , 2018, JAMA neurology.

[15]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Intra-Rater, Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of an Instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) Test in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease , 2016, PloS one.

[16]  R. C. L. Cuerda,et al.  Mobile phone applications in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review , 2019, Neurología (English Edition).

[17]  Jin-Siang Shaw,et al.  Gait Disorders in Parkinson's Disease: Assessment and Management , 2013 .

[18]  Carolynn Patten,et al.  Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal Chiropractic Medicine.

[20]  J. Hughes,et al.  Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[21]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  S. Wood-Dauphinée,et al.  The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  Francisco Molina-Rueda,et al.  Observational Gait Assessments in People With Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  J. Miangolarra-Page,et al.  Axial rigidity and quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a preliminary study , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[25]  A. Behrman,et al.  Minimal detectable change for spatial and temporal measurements of gait after incomplete spinal cord injury. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.