Recognizing self in puppet controlled virtual avatars

Recent work in neuroscience suggests that there is a common coding in the brain between perception, imagination and execution of movement. Further, this common coding is considered to allow people to recognize their own movements when presented as abstract representations, and coordinate with these movements better. We are investigating how this 'own movement effect' could be extended to improve the interaction between players and game avatars, and how it might be leveraged to augment players' cognition. To examine this question, we have designed and developed a tangible puppet interface and 3D virtual environment that are tailored to investigate the mapping between player and avatar movements. In a set of two experiments, we show that when the puppet interface is used to transfer players' movements to the avatar, the players are able to recognize their own movements, when presented alongside others' movements. In both experiments, players did not observe their movements being transferred to the avatar, and the recognition occurred after a week of the transfer. Since the recognition effect persisted even with these two handicaps, we conclude that this is a robust effect, and the puppet interface is effective in personalizing an avatar, by transferring a player's own movements to the virtual character.

[1]  Yanfeng Chen,et al.  Ideomotor design: Using common coding theory to derive novel video game interactions , 2010 .

[2]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  The Social Nature of Perception and Action , 2006 .

[3]  Bruce Blumberg,et al.  Sympathetic interfaces: using a plush toy to direct synthetic characters , 1999, CHI '99.

[4]  W. Prinz An ideomotor approach to imitation , 2005 .

[5]  Ali Mazalek,et al.  Tangible interfaces for real-time 3D virtual environments , 2007, ACE '07.

[6]  Erik Strommen,et al.  Evolution of the talking dinosaur: the (not so) natural history of a new interface for children , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[7]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Predicting the Effects of Actions: Interactions of Perception and Action , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  June Andrews,et al.  Keeping it real. , 2003, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[9]  Michael Nitsche,et al.  Puppet Show : Intuitive Puppet Interfaces for Expressive Character Control , 2006 .

[10]  A. Goldman,et al.  The Shared Circuits Model: How Control, Mirroring and Simulation Can Enable Imitation, Deliberation, and Mindreading , 2007 .

[11]  T. Beardsworth,et al.  The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one’s movements without seeing one’s body , 1981 .

[12]  M. Jeannerod The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Paul Clifton,et al.  Giving your self to the game: transferring a player's own movements to avatars using tangible interfaces , 2009, Sandbox@SIGGRAPH.

[14]  Becky Beal,et al.  `Keeping It Real' , 2003 .

[15]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[16]  S. Hurley The shared circuits model (SCM): how control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[17]  W Prinz,et al.  Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Chris Esposito,et al.  Of mice and monkeys: a specialized input device for virtual body animation , 1995, I3D '95.