How Does Novelty Enter Spatial Planning

Since its emergence in the second half of the 19th century, spatial planning has been assigned the task of shaping and structuring spaces (typically defined along the lines of administrative units) and regulating spatial development in the various dimensions of space as a natural, built, infrastructural, economic, and social environment. The ways in which this task has been approached, how and which goals have been set, and what procedures have been applied to pursue them has also always been subject to reorientation and change. This chapter addresses such instances of reorientation in spatial planning that are not perceived as simply improving upon and refining established routines but as representing fundamental changes that break with these routines.

[1]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. , 2010 .

[2]  K. Morgan The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[3]  Eugene J. McCann,et al.  Relationality/territoriality: Toward a conceptualization of cities in the world , 2010 .

[4]  L. Prior Using Documents in Social Research , 2003 .

[5]  S. Güntner Soziale Stadtpolitik: Institutionen, Netzwerke und Diskurse in der Politikgestaltung , 2007 .

[6]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  A decision-centred view of environmental planning , 1987 .

[7]  R. Keller Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse : Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms , 2005 .

[8]  L. Orsenigo,et al.  In Defence of the Linear Model: An Essay , 2010 .

[9]  Oliver Ibert,et al.  Network dynamics in constellations of cultural differences: Relational distance in innovation processes in legal services and biotechnology , 2015 .

[10]  U. Walther Soziale Stadt — Zwischenbilanzen , 2002 .

[11]  Werner Rammert,et al.  Die Innovationen der Gesellschaft , 2010 .

[12]  D. Bayliss Creative planning in Ireland: the role of culture‐led development in Irish planning , 2004 .

[13]  U. Walther Soziale Stadt - Zwischenbilanzen : ein Programm auf dem Weg zur sozialen Stadt? , 2002 .

[14]  Louis Albrechts,et al.  Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined , 2004 .

[15]  Michael Schwarz,et al.  »Soziale Innovation« im Fokus: Skizze eines gesellschaftstheoretisch inspirierten Forschungskonzepts , 2010 .

[16]  W. Zapf Über soziale Innovationen , 1994 .

[17]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse , 2010 .

[18]  H. Martens Beteiligung als soziale Innovation , 2010 .

[19]  A. Mehmood,et al.  The International Handbook on Social Innovation , 2013 .

[20]  H. Knoblauch,et al.  Innovation society today: the reflexive creation of novelty , 2015 .

[21]  Klaus R. Kunzmann,et al.  Culture, creativity and spatial planning , 2004 .

[22]  Colin McFarlane,et al.  Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach , 2006 .

[23]  Richard Florida,et al.  The Learning Region , 2002 .

[24]  Frank Moulaert,et al.  Social Innovation research: A New Stage in Innovation Analysis? , 2013 .

[25]  J. Peck,et al.  Recombinant workfare, across the Americas: Transnationalizing “fast” social policy , 2010 .

[26]  Gernot Grabher Lob der Verschwendung: Redundanz in der Regionalentwicklung ; ein sozioökonomisches Plädoyer , 1994 .