Inferring the Effect of Species Interactions on Trait Evolution

Abstract Models of trait evolution form an important part of macroevolutionary biology. The Brownian motion model and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck models have become classic (null) models of character evolution, in which species evolve independently. Recently, models incorporating species interactions have been developed, particularly involving competition where abiotic factors pull species toward an optimal trait value and competitive interactions drive the trait values apart. However, these models assume a fitness function rather than derive it from population dynamics and they do not consider dynamics of the trait variance. Here, we develop a general coherent trait evolution framework where the fitness function is based on a model of population dynamics, and therefore it can, in principle, accommodate any type of species interaction. We illustrate our framework with a model of abundance-dependent competitive interactions against a macroevolutionary background encoded in a phylogenetic tree. We develop an inference tool based on Approximate Bayesian Computation and test it on simulated data (of traits at the tips). We find that inference performs well when the diversity predicted by the parameters equals the number of species in the phylogeny. We then fit the model to empirical data of baleen whale body lengths, using three different summary statistics, and compare it to a model without population dynamics and a model where competition depends on the total metabolic rate of the competitors. We show that the unweighted model performs best for the least informative summary statistic, while the model with competition weighted by the total metabolic rate fits the data slightly better than the other two models for the two more informative summary statistics. Regardless of the summary statistic used, the three models substantially differ in their predictions of the abundance distribution. Therefore, data on abundance distributions will allow us to better distinguish the models from one another, and infer the nature of species interactions. Thus, our framework provides a conceptual approach to reveal species interactions underlying trait evolution and identifies the data needed to do so in practice. [Approximate Bayesian computation; competition; phylogeny; population dynamics; simulations; species interaction; trait evolution.]

[1]  G. Hunt Rates of Evolution: A Quantitative Synthesis. By Philip D. Gingerich. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. $84.99. xv + 381 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-1-107-16724-7. 2019. , 2019 .

[2]  Hélène Morlon,et al.  Understanding the effect of competition during evolutionary radiations: an integrated model of phenotypic and species diversification. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[3]  Matthew W. Pennell,et al.  Detecting the macroevolutionary signal of species interactions , 2019, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[4]  C. Darwin On the origin of species by means of natural selection: Or the preservation of the favoured races in the struggle for life. , 2019 .

[5]  R. Etienne,et al.  Detecting local diversity‐dependence in diversification , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  J. Goldbogen,et al.  Independent evolution of baleen whale gigantism linked to Plio-Pleistocene ocean dynamics , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Amaury Lambert,et al.  A Unifying Comparative Phylogenetic Framework Including Traits Coevolving Across Interacting Lineages. , 2016, Systematic biology.

[8]  A. Hendry,et al.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  T. Garland,et al.  An assessment of phylogenetic tools for analyzing the interplay between interspecific interactions and phenotypic evolution , 2016, bioRxiv.

[10]  H. Morlon,et al.  Estimating the Effect of Competition on Trait Evolution Using Maximum Likelihood Inference. , 2016, Systematic biology.

[11]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Trait evolution in adaptive radiations: modelling and measuring interspecific competition on phylogenies , 2015, bioRxiv.

[12]  J. Fox,et al.  Using phylogenetics in community assembly and ecosystem functioning research , 2015 .

[13]  R. Etienne,et al.  A new dynamic null model for phylogenetic community structure , 2015, Ecology letters.

[14]  A. Ives,et al.  Phylogenetic trait-based analyses of ecological networks. , 2013, Ecology.

[15]  P. Turnbaugh,et al.  Exceptional Convergence on the Macroevolutionary Landscape in Island Lizard Radiations , 2013, Science.

[16]  Matthew W. Pennell,et al.  An integrative view of phylogenetic comparative methods: connections to population genetics, community ecology, and paleobiology , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Corander,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Computation , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  W. P. Byrd,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics , 2012, Quantitative Genetics.

[19]  N. McCarthy Tumour heterogeneity: Darwin's finches , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[20]  A. Phillimore,et al.  Diversity-dependence brings molecular phylogenies closer to agreement with the fossil record , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  T. Schoener The Newest Synthesis: Understanding the Interplay of Evolutionary and Ecological Dynamics , 2011, Science.

[22]  Mark D. Uhen,et al.  The Evolution of Maximum Body Size of Terrestrial Mammals , 2010, Science.

[23]  F. Rousset,et al.  Stochasticity in evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  David Welch,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Effects of phenotypic complementarity and phylogeny on the nested structure of mutualistic networks , 2007 .

[26]  Peter R. Grant,et al.  Evolution of Character Displacement in Darwin's Finches , 2006, Science.

[27]  A. Ives,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Trophic Associations , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Han Olff,et al.  Demystifying the West, Brown & Enquist model of the allometry of metabolism , 2006 .

[29]  T. Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[30]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  A world without competition , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Using the Past to Predict the Present: Confidence Intervals for Regression Equations in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[32]  E. Martins,et al.  TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  J. Damuth Interspecific allometry of population density in mammals and other animals: the independence of body mass and population energy‐use , 1987 .

[34]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[35]  R. Peters,et al.  Relations between Individual Size and Mammalian Population Density , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[36]  R. Peters,et al.  The effect of body size on animal abundance , 1983, Oecologia.

[37]  J. Damuth,et al.  Population density and body size in mammals , 1981, Nature.

[38]  R. Lande NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  C. Lockyer,et al.  Body weights of some species of large whales , 1976 .

[40]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Stochastic Models of Phylogeny and the Evolution of Diversity , 1973, The Journal of Geology.

[41]  L. V. Valen,et al.  Variation Genetics of Extinct Animals , 1969 .

[42]  J. Crow,et al.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. , 1964, Genetics.

[43]  J. Paclt A Protest Against the Atomizing of Genera, with Special Reference to the Hepialidae (Lepidoptera) , 1957 .

[44]  M. Kleiber Body size and metabolic rate. , 1947, Physiological reviews.

[45]  Samuel Brody,et al.  Bioenergetics and growth. With special reference to the efficiency complex in domestic animals. , 1946 .

[46]  A. Bennett The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection; or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1872, Nature.

[47]  L. Harmon,et al.  Predicting rates of interspecific interaction from phylogenetic trees. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[48]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[49]  S. A. Barnett,et al.  The major features of evolution , 1955 .

[50]  S. Brody,et al.  Relation between basal metabolism and mature body-weight in different species of mammals and birds. , 1932 .