Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve?

AbstractPurposeThe factors related to the learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy have rarely been evaluated.MethodsA retrospective study of 32 patients who underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy performed at a high-volume center by a single pancreatic surgeon experienced with laparoscopic surgery was conducted. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data were collected. The primary endpoint was the length of the operation. The secondary endpoints were the conversion and reoperation rates, overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, the length of hospital stay and rate of unplanned splenectomy.ResultsThe length of the operation and the cumulative sum of the procedures presented a logarithmic correlation (P = 0.048). The learning curve appeared to have been completed after 17 procedures (P = 0.040). The multivariate analysis confirmed that the completion of the learning curve (CLC) reduced the length of the operation by 18 % (P = 0.009), but extended resection increased the length of the operation (P = 0.023). The conversion and reoperation rates, overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and length of the hospital stay were not related to the CLC. Unplanned splenectomy was more frequently performed during the first 17 procedures.ConclusionsThe length of the operation seems to be the main factor related to the CLC for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The learning curve could be considered to be completed after about 17 procedures if performed by surgeons experienced with laparoscopic techniques at high-volume centers.

[1]  H. Kitagawa,et al.  The management of a remnant pancreatic stump for preventing the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy , 2013, Surgery Today.

[2]  C. Ricci,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case–control study , 2010, Updates in surgery.

[3]  Y. Mintz,et al.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: ascending the learning curve. , 2004, Surgical endoscopy.

[4]  R. Hutchins,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Matched Studies Comparing Open and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: Is It a Safe Procedure? , 2012, Pancreas.

[5]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  Scenario 1 : Complication After a Surgical Procedure Not Caused by a Surgeon , 2022 .

[6]  Abe Fingerhut,et al.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. , 2007, Surgery.

[7]  J. Zehetner,et al.  Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  C. Ricci,et al.  Assessment of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification after distal pancreatectomy. , 2011, JOP : Journal of the pancreas.

[9]  Dong Hyun Choi,et al.  Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  J. Neoptolemos,et al.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. , 2005, Surgery.

[11]  M. Braga,et al.  Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital , 2012, Updates in Surgery.

[12]  M. Makary,et al.  Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Is Associated With Significantly Less Overall Morbidity Compared to the Open Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[13]  C. Ricci,et al.  The usefulness of a grading system for complications resulting from pancreatic resections: a single center experience , 2011, Updates in surgery.