Investigation of clinical factors associated with longer overall survival in advanced melanoma patients treated with sequential ipilimumab

Melanoma is one of the most serious form of skin cancer. Nowadays, ipilimumab is used for advanced melanoma refractory to first‐line anti‐programmed death 1 (PD‐1) antibodies. Thirty patients (male : female ratio, 18:12; median age, 60.5 years) sequentially treated with ipilimumab after anti‐PD‐1 antibody (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), while 58 (male : female ratio, 27:31; median age, 66.5 years) with anti‐PD‐1 antibody only. The kind of therapy and schedules were as follows: nivolumab, 2 mg/kg at 3‐week intervals or at 3 mg/kg every 2 week; pembrolizumab, 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg at 3‐week intervals for four doses. The sequential therapy was selected for the patients with disease progression and/or recovered from severe (immune‐related [ir]) adverse events (AE) after PD‐1 blockade monotherapy. We evaluated multiple parameters and analyzed their relevance to overall survival (OS). The best objective response rate was 6.7% in sequential ipilimumab treatment. Median OS was 163 days (range, 16–489). Baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and performance status (PS) before sequential ipilimumab were associated with OS in univariate analyses. Baseline PS and irAE within 6 weeks after ipilimumab administration showed significant differences on multivariate analysis. Prior to first‐line PD‐1 blockade, these parameters were not associated with OS. The other factors (i.e. age, sex, number of doses, absolute neutrophil counts, neutrophil : lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase and C‐reactive protein) were not associated with OS. [Correction added on 17 April 2019, after first online publication: ‘not related to OS' has been amended to ‘not associated with OS’.] Ipilimumab as sequential therapy did not appear to improve OS and was associated with more severe irAE than PD‐1 blockade monotherapy. We need to carefully consider treating patients with poor PS and low ALC.

[1]  Cheng-Ta Yang,et al.  Consolidation treatment of durvalumab after chemoradiation in real‐world patients with stage III unresectable non‐small cell lung cancer , 2020, Thoracic cancer.

[2]  J. Watanabe,et al.  High absolute lymphocyte counts are associated with longer overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin—but not with treatment of physician’s choice—in the EMBRACE study , 2020, Breast Cancer.

[3]  G. Madonna,et al.  Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR could predict overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab , 2018, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[4]  R. Deberardinis,et al.  Metabolic strategies of melanoma cells: Mechanisms, interactions with the tumor microenvironment, and therapeutic implications , 2018, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[5]  Y. Fujisawa,et al.  Retrospective study of advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab after nivolumab: Analysis of 60 Japanese patients. , 2018, Journal of dermatological science.

[6]  A. Otsuka,et al.  Efficacy and safety of retreatment with nivolumab in metastatic melanoma patients previously treated with nivolumab , 2017, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[7]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Utikal,et al.  Ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after progression on anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced melanoma. , 2017, European journal of cancer.

[9]  K. E. Ng,et al.  An Overview of the Changing Landscape of Treatment for Advanced Melanoma , 2017, Pharmacotherapy.

[10]  G. Linette,et al.  Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  R. Sullivan,et al.  Clinical outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma treated with PD‐1 and PD‐L1 antibodies , 2016, Cancer.

[12]  M. Amagai,et al.  Nivolumab for advanced melanoma: pretreatment prognostic factors and early outcome markers during therapy , 2016, Oncotarget.

[13]  D. Hogg,et al.  The full blood count as a biomarker of outcome and toxicity in ipilimumab‐treated cutaneous metastatic melanoma , 2016, Cancer medicine.

[14]  C. Horak,et al.  Sequential administration of nivolumab and ipilimumab with a planned switch in patients with advanced melanoma (CheckMate 064): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  S. Ugurel,et al.  Nebenwirkungsmanagement bei Immun‐Checkpoint‐Blockade durch CTLA‐4‐ und PD1‐Antikörper beim metastasierten Melanom , 2016, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[16]  K. Kähler,et al.  Management of side effects of immune checkpoint blockade by anti‐CTLA‐4 and anti‐PD‐1 antibodies in metastatic melanoma , 2016, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[17]  M. Millward,et al.  Efficacy and toxicity of treatment with the anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma after prior anti-PD-1 therapy , 2016, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  P. Ascierto,et al.  Baseline neutrophils and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: prognostic relevance in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  L. Scott Nivolumab: A Review in Advanced Melanoma , 2015, Drugs.

[20]  Dirk Schadendorf,et al.  Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Lesly A. Dossett,et al.  BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma , 2015, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[23]  David C. Smith,et al.  Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Single-institution experience with ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients in the compassionate use setting , 2010, Cancer.

[25]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[26]  M. Maio,et al.  Therapeutic efficacy of ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, in patients with metastatic melanoma unresponsive to prior systemic treatments: clinical and immunological evidence from three patient cases , 2009, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.