Challenges of using topology optimization for the design of pressurized stiffened panels

Topology optimization has been successfully used in several case studies in aerospace and automotive industries to generate innovative design concepts that lead to weight savings. This motivates the exploration of this new approach for the design of an aircraft flat pressure bulkhead. However, no studies were conducted on this type of structure. Therefore, this paper presents and discusses the challenges associated with the design of flat pressurized plate using topology optimization (SIMP (Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization) method). A simply supported rectangular plate is used as the design case and a typical layout is defined as a comparison basis. The mass of the interpreted design concepts are obtained with a simplified sizing approach taking into consideration stress and displacement constraints. Results show that the topology layout is not unique as is sensitive to optimization parameters. Moreover, the interpretation of the layout is challenging as they are driven by complex interactions. Finally, the performance of the topology design concept is at most comparable with the typical layout and no significant improvement is obtained. The study highlights the importance of performing an extensive topology study in order to better understand the behavior of the design before creating a concept. An improved topology design process is finally proposed in order to provide guidance to industrial designers.

[1]  J. Petersson,et al.  Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima , 1998 .

[2]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[3]  G. Rozvany.  Aims, scope, methods, history and unified terminology of computer-aided topology optimization in structural mechanics , 2001 .

[4]  Boris Štok,et al.  Two-stage design optimization of shell structures , 1996 .

[5]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[6]  Alexis Dugré,et al.  A Design Process Using Topology Optimization Applied to Flat Pressurized Stiffened Panels , 2014 .

[7]  D DeatonJoshua,et al.  A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization , 2014 .

[8]  Silvana M. B. Afonso,et al.  Structural optimization strategies for simple and integrally stiffened plates and shells , 2005 .

[9]  Ethan,et al.  Topology Optimization Risk Reduction , 2008 .

[10]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000 , 2014 .

[11]  Y. C. Lam,et al.  Automated rib location and optimization for plate structures , 2003 .

[12]  M. C. Niu,et al.  Airframe Stress Analysis and Sizing , 2011 .

[13]  John Rasmussen,et al.  Combined shape and reinforcement layout optimization of shell structures , 2004 .

[14]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[15]  M. Zhou,et al.  Checkerboard and minimum member size control in topology optimization , 2001 .

[16]  H. Gea,et al.  A systematic topology optimization approach for optimal stiffener design , 1998 .

[17]  Lars Krog,et al.  Application of Topology, Sizing and Shape Optimization Methods to Optimal Design of Aircraft Components , 2011 .

[18]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Topology optimization approaches , 2013, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[19]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  On CAD-integrated structural topology and design optimization , 1991 .

[20]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .

[21]  M. Zhou,et al.  Generalized shape optimization without homogenization , 1992 .

[22]  Poh-Soong Tang,et al.  Topology Layout of Structural Designs and Buckling , 2004 .

[23]  E. Lund,et al.  Nonlinear topology optimization of layered shell structures , 2005 .

[24]  E. F. Bruhn,et al.  Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures , 1973 .