A Preliminary Case Study for Collaborative Quality Enhancement
暂无分享,去创建一个
Eight universities have collaborated in an Erasmus+ funded project to create a lean process to enhance self-evaluation and accreditation through peer alliance and cooperation. Central to this process is the partnering of two institutions as critical friends, based on prior selfevaluations of specific programmes to identify particular criteria for improvement. A pairing algorithm matches two institutions based on their respective self-evaluation scores. It ensures there are significant differences in key criteria that are mutually beneficial for future programme development and enhancement. The ensuing meetings between critical friends have been designated as ‘cross-sparring’. This paper focuses on a case-study of the crosssparring and resulting enhancement outcomes between Umeå University and Queen’s University Belfast, and their respective Masters programmes in Software Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. The collaborative experiences of the process are evaluated, reported, discussed and conclusions provided on the efficacy of this particular application of cross-sparring.
[1] Juha Kontio,et al. Developing a Robust Self Evaluation Framework for Active Learning: The First Stage of an Erasmus+ Project (QAEMarketPlace4HEI) , 2015 .
[2] Juha Kontio,et al. QA and Enhancement Marketplace for HEIs – An Erasmus+ project , 2015 .
[3] Katriina Schrey-Niemenmaa,et al. Using accreditation criteria for collaborative quality enhancement , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL).