Social foraging in cliff swallows: local enhancement, risk sensitivity, competition and the avoidance of predators

Abstract Colonically nesting cliff swallows, Hirundo pyrrhonota, in southwestern Nebraska, U.S.A., often forage socially, in groups of two to more than 1000 individuals, on ephemeral concentrations of insects. Social foraging was promoted through information transfer among individuals at fixed colony sites, and through local enhancement in which foraging activities of some individuals attracted others to a food source. Cliff swallows feeding in groups had greater average foraging success (prey capture attempts per min) than birds feeding solitarily. Variance in prey capture success, and thus foraging risk, declined with group size and was greatest for solitary foragers. Solitary cliff swallows whose foraging success equalled or exceeded that expected from social foraging remained solitary during a given foraging bout. Solitary foragers whose success fell below that expected from social foraging joined foraging groups. For individuals foraging socially there was no consistent relationship between foraging success and group size, indicating little competition among group members for food and little resource depression. Social foraging in cliff swallows is probably not an adaptation mainly to decrease individuals' risk of predation because foraging success did not differ for birds foraging on the edges versus in the centres of groups, and individuals foraging on the edges did not try to move toward the centre. These data are consistent with risk-sensitive foraging models and provide the first empirical demonstration with free-living animals that social foraging is associated with decreased individual variance in foraging success.

[1]  W. W. Mayhew The Biology of the Cliff Swallow in California , 1958 .

[2]  E. C. Waltz Resource Characteristics and the Evolution of Information Centers , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[3]  S. M. Evans,et al.  Influence of position in the flock and flock size on vigilance in the starling, Sturnus vulgaris , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  A. J. Marshall,et al.  Biology and comparative physiology of birds. , 1962 .

[6]  C. R. Brown,et al.  Cliff Swallow Colonies as Information Centers , 1986, Science.

[7]  H. Ronald Pulliam,et al.  Chapter 3 – SOCIAL ORGANIZATION IN THE NONREPRODUCTIVE SEASON , 1982 .

[8]  P. Withers Energetic aspects of reproduction by the cliff swallow , 1977 .

[9]  Charles R. Brown,et al.  Enhanced Foraging Efficiency Through Information Centers: A Benefit of Coloniality in Cliff Swallows , 1988 .

[10]  T. Caraco Aspects of risk-aversion in foraging white-crowned sparrows , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  M. Brown,et al.  Ectoparasitism as a Cost of Coloniality in Cliff Swallows (Hirundo Pyrrhonota) , 1986 .

[12]  J. T. Emlen,et al.  Territory, Nest Building, and Pair Formation in the Cliff Swallow , 1954 .

[13]  D. E. Samuel The Breeding Biology of Barn and Cliff Swallows in West Virginia , 1971 .

[14]  C. Clark,et al.  Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[15]  E. Charnov,et al.  Ecological Implications of Resource Depression , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[16]  James F. Wittenberger Chapter 1 – THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF COLONIALITY IN BIRDS , 1985 .

[17]  R. Bayer HOW IMPORTANT ARE BIRD COLONIES AS INFORMATION CENTERS , 1982 .

[18]  P. Sherman,et al.  ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF BANK SWALLOW (RIPARIA RIPARIA) COLONIALITY , 1976 .

[19]  J. T. Emlen SOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN NESTING CLIFF SWALLOWS , 1952 .

[20]  Thomas Caraco,et al.  Risk‐Sensitivity and Foraging Groups , 1981 .

[21]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[22]  L. Real UNCERTAINTY AND POLLINATOR-PLANT INTERACTIONS: THE FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF BEES AND WASPS ON ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS' , 1981 .

[23]  Alden H. Miller,et al.  The Distribution of the Birds of California , 1946, Nature.

[24]  I. R. Inglis,et al.  Vigilance and Flock Size in Brent Geese: The Edge Effect , 1981 .

[25]  B. Heinrich,et al.  Floral preferences of bumblebees (Bombus edwardsii) in relation to intermittent versus continuous rewards , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .