Challenges for Industrial Ecology in Practice and Theory

This special feature on visions for industrial ecology originates from the Third International Conference on Eco-Efficiency, held in the Netherlands, 9–11 June 2010. For the final day of the conference, a number of people were invited to contribute a vision on key directions for the development of the domain of industrial ecology in general and on the role of eco-efficiency in particular. The results—not all presented at the conference but prepared for it—together form a special section of this issue of the Journal of Industrial Ecology, diverse and, we hope, inspiring. The subject of eco-efficiency may be seen as a technical one—as a goal in itself. It is not. It is one key to improved environmental performance of society. Combined with improved economic performance in the form of productivity growth, it may tell in which direction we are going, or might, or should go. If absolute decoupling of environmental impact from economic growth is the goal, we should know whether policies and innovations are getting us on the right track. Will unleashing resource productivity get us on the right track and avoid the Jevons paradox? Should we focus on fiscal reform to get us there? Is the innovation entry to sustainable development powerful enough, and what is driving innovations and their implementation? If degrowth, for increased happiness and environmental quality, is the goal and we wish to deviate from the unsustainable route of ever-expanding production and consumption, the same question has to be answered: Are we on the right track? “We” here refers to society at large, from a global perspective, in principle. And we know that not just marginal, small improvements are to be realized. We need more

[1]  R. Cummins,et al.  Happiness versus the Environment—A Case Study of Australian Lifestyles , 2013 .

[2]  D. Wadley The Shadows of Consumption: Consequences for the Global Environment , 2013 .

[3]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update , 2013 .

[4]  Paul Ekins,et al.  The implications for households of environmental tax reform (ETR) in Europe , 2011 .

[5]  Helmut J. Geist,et al.  Linkages of Sustainability , 2011 .

[6]  S. O'Neill,et al.  Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’? , 2011 .

[7]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Environmental Tax Reform (ETR): A Policy for Green Growth , 2011 .

[8]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  A. Markandya,et al.  The DICER Model: Methodological Issues and Initial Results , 2010 .

[10]  T. Trainer Can renewables etc. solve the greenhouse problem? The negative case , 2010 .

[11]  B. Weidema,et al.  Avoiding Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment Revisited , 2010 .

[12]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Generalized Make and Use Framework for Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment , 2010 .

[13]  D. Macey,et al.  Farewell to Growth , 2010 .

[14]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Provisions and Action Steps , 2010 .

[15]  Shigemi Kagawa,et al.  IMPROVING THE COMPLETENESS OF PRODUCT CARBON FOOTPRINTS USING A GLOBAL LINK INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL: THE CASE OF JAPAN , 2009 .

[16]  M. Weitzman,et al.  On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[17]  W. Nordhaus,et al.  An Analysis of the Dismal Theorem , 2009 .

[18]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Carbon-Energy Taxation: Lessons from Europe , 2009 .

[19]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA , 2009 .

[20]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. : Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. , 2009 .

[21]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis , 2008 .

[22]  Maj Munch Andersen,et al.  Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: an evidence based view , 2008 .

[23]  Angela Druckman,et al.  A geographically and socio-economically disaggregated local household consumption model for the UK , 2008 .

[24]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Being undisciplined: Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond , 2008 .

[25]  Aleksander Zidanšek,et al.  Sustainable development and happiness in nations , 2007 .

[26]  Ingolfur Blühdorn Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation , 2007 .

[27]  John M. Gowdy,et al.  Environmental degradation and happiness , 2007 .

[28]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it and how? , 2006 .

[29]  Tim Jackson,et al.  The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Consumption , 2006 .

[30]  M. Jalas The Everyday Life Context of Increasing Energy Demands: Time Use Survey Data in a Decomposition Analysis , 2005 .

[31]  Shinichiro Nakamura,et al.  Input‐Output Analysis of Waste Management , 2002 .

[32]  Bart Los,et al.  Structural Decomposition Analyses with Dependent Determinants , 2000 .

[33]  E. Alsema,et al.  Environmental Aspects of PV Power Systems , 1997 .

[34]  A. Meyer Economics Of Climate Change , 1995, Nature.

[35]  Otto Neurath Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis , 1973 .

[36]  H. Hotelling The economics of exhaustible resources , 1931, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  R. Carnap,et al.  The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle , 1929 .