Field calibration of a capacitance soil water probe in heterogeneous fields

Soil water research requires methods to perform accurate measurements. A capacitance probe gauge has characteristics that seem to make it an attractive replacement for neutron scatter gauges to measure soil water content, but there is evidence that capacitance systems should be calibrated for individual soils. Laboratory calibrations and many field calibration methods are costly and time-consuming, and controlled conditions and disturbed soil samples do not always reflect field conditions, and thus, they are inadequate for practical use. The objectives of the present study were (i) to test a simple field calibration method for a recently developed capacitive sensor even under highly variable soil texture conditions, and (ii) to validate this approach under various soil moisture conditions. Soil samples were taken 0.5 m from the access tube of the sensor and a whole field calibration and several site-specific calibrations were developed using 10-142 observations per site under different soil water regimes. A regression of soil water content estimated by sensor reading on water content obtained by core sampling showed no significant difference in the slope and intercept of the 1:1 line when the field calibration was applied. However, the precision of the calibration was only considerably increased if the estimations were based on site-specific calibrations developed on at least 35 observations per site. The precision and accuracy of the calibration equations were not affected when data were obtained only under wet or dry soil conditions. The method presented in this paper is a speedy and cheap way to calibrate capacitance probe sensors. SR03 D. Ge e et al Fiel i ta

[1]  Patrick N.J. Lane,et al.  Field and laboratory calibration and test of TDR and capacitance techniques for indirect measurement of soil water content , 2001 .

[2]  T. J. Dean,et al.  Soil moisture measurement by an improved capacitance technique, part II. Field techniques, evaluation and calibration , 1987 .

[3]  M. A. Hilhorst,et al.  Influence of gravimetric water content and bulk density on the dielectric properties of soil. , 1996 .

[4]  Blaine R. Hanson,et al.  Soil type affects accuracy of dielectric moisture sensors , 2000 .

[5]  J. Starr,et al.  Real-time soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes : Laboratory calibration , 1997 .

[6]  Jean L. Steiner,et al.  PRECISION OF NEUTRON SCATTERING AND CAPACITANCE TYPE SOIL WATER CONTENT GAUGES FROM FIELD CALIBRATION , 1995 .

[7]  J. Anderson,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF A SOIL WATER‐CAPACITANCE PROBE IN A FINE SAND , 1995 .

[8]  T. J. Dean,et al.  SOIL MOISTURE MEASUREMENT BY AN IMPROVED CAPACITANCE TECHNIQUE, PART I. SENSOR DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE , 1987 .

[9]  K. Morgan,et al.  Comparison of laboratory- and field-derived soil water retention curves for a fine sand soil using tensiometric, resistance and capacitance methods , 2001, Plant and Soil.

[10]  P. Bertuzzi,et al.  Field Evaluation and Error Analysis of Soil Water Content Measurement using the Capacitance Probe Method , 1997 .

[11]  David Cooper,et al.  Soil Water Content , 2003 .

[12]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  Soil Material, Temperature, and Salinity Effects on Calibration of Multisensor Capacitance Probes , 2000 .

[13]  Gerrit H. de Rooij,et al.  Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods , 2004 .

[14]  D. J. Pitts,et al.  Field Calibration of a Capacitance Water Content Probe in Fine Sand Soils , 1999 .

[15]  T. J. Dean,et al.  Soil water content measurement with a high-frequency capacitance sensor , 1998 .