A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact

Learning management systems (LMSs) are very widely used in higher education. However, much of the research on LMSs has had a technology focus or has been limited to studies of adoption. In order to take advantage of the potential associated with LMSs, research that addresses the role of LMSs in learning success is needed. Task-technology fit is one factor that has been shown to influence both the use of information systems and their performance impacts. The study described in this paper used the technology-to-performance chain as a framework to address the question of how task-technology fit influences the performance impacts of LMSs. The results provide strong support for the importance of task-technology fit, which influenced perceived impact on learning both directly and indirectly via level of utilization. Whilst task-technology fit had a strong influence on perceived impact of the LMS on learning it only had a weak impact on outcomes in terms of student grades. Contrary to expectations, facilitating conditions and common social norms did not play a role in the performance impacts of LMSs. However, instructor norms had a significant effect on perceived impact on learning via LMS utilization.

[1]  Jijie Wang,et al.  Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Jane Klobas,et al.  Evaluating the impact of computer-supported international collaborative teamwork in business education , 1998 .

[4]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Short Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Assessing software maintenance tool utilization using task-technology fit and fitness-for-use models , 1998, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[8]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[9]  H. Triandis.  Attitude and attitude change , 1971 .

[10]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[13]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[14]  I. Ajzen.  Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations , 2002 .

[15]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting Computer Task Performance: Personal Goal and Self-Efficacy , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[16]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  David C. Yen,et al.  The New Spectrum of the Cross-Enterprise Solution: The Integration of Supply Chain Management and Enterprise Resources Planning Systems , 2000, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Investigating university student preferences and beliefs about learning in the web-based context , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[20]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[21]  J. Webster,et al.  Teaching Effectiveness in Technology-Mediated Distance Learning , 1997 .

[22]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Investigation Center for the Study of Reading Center for the Study of Reading Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Invest , 2007 .

[23]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Testing the Technology-to-Performance Chain Model , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[24]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning - A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  John D'Ambra,et al.  Use of the World Wide Web for international travel: Integrating the construct of uncertainty in information seeking and the task-technology fit (TTF) model , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[27]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[31]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  What we know about CSCL and implementing it in higher education , 2004 .

[32]  Mary Sumner,et al.  Factors Influencing the Adoption of Technology in Teaching , 1999 .

[33]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[34]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[35]  Margi Levy,et al.  Developing a 3-D model of information systems success , 1998 .

[36]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The measurement of the impacts of the IIC on the end‐users: The survey , 1997 .

[37]  R. Oliver.  A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[38]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[39]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  The importance of participant interaction in online environments , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[40]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[41]  Peter Williams,et al.  The Learning Web , 2002 .

[42]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Practices and orientations of CSCL , 2004 .

[43]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[44]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Dale L. Goodhue,et al.  The model underlying the measurement of the impacts of the IIC on the end‐users , 1997 .

[46]  Edward J. Garrity,et al.  Information systems success measurement , 1998 .

[47]  Waiman Cheung,et al.  Determinants of the intention to use Internet/WWW at work: a confirmatory study , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[50]  H. Coates,et al.  A Critical Examination Of The Effects Of Learning Management Systems On University Teaching And Learning , 2005 .

[51]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[52]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[54]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[55]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web‐based learning continuance intention , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[56]  Martin Graff,et al.  Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[57]  Michael C. W. Yip.  Using WebCT to teach courses online , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[58]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[59]  Richard Walker,et al.  A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom , 2006, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[60]  Seung Youn Chyung,et al.  An Investigation of the Profiles of Satisfying and Dissatisfying Factors in E‐Learning , 2008 .

[61]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[62]  Terry Ryan,et al.  The Role of Social Presence and Moderating Role of Computer Self-Efficacy in Predicting the Continuance Usage of E-Learning Systems , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[63]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  Behavioral science foundations of consumer behavior , 1973 .

[64]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  User developed application success: sources and effects of involvement , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[65]  Kjell Erik Rudestam,et al.  Handbook of Online Learning: Innovations in Higher Education and Corporate Training , 2002 .

[66]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Exploring the measurement of end user computing success , 1999 .

[67]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[68]  Steven Hornik,et al.  When Technology Does Not Support Learning: Conflicts Between Epistemological Beliefs and Technology Support in Virtual Learning Environments , 2007, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[69]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Can e-learning replace classroom learning? , 2004, CACM.

[70]  Barbara D. Klein,et al.  User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[71]  Betty Collis,et al.  Models of technology and change in higher education: an international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher education , 2002 .