Task Effects on Focus on Form in Synchronous Computer‐Mediated Communication

Previous research on synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) has shown that SCMC interaction could draw learners' attention to form in ways that are similar to face-to-face interaction. However, the role of task type in focusing learners' attention on form has not been widely researched. In a repeated-measures design, this study investigated if task type had any effect on the number and characteristics of focus-on-form instances of 54 English-as-a-foreign-language learners. Two jigsaw-dictogloss task pairs were designed and matched for content. Following a practice task session, randomly formed dyads performed each of the tasks using MSN Messenger and CoWord software. Language-related episodes (LREs) were identified and categorized according to their focus, outcome, and type. Results showed that the dictogloss task elicited a higher number of LREs than the jigsaw task. Tasks also displayed some differences with respect to the characteristics of LREs. Whereas the dictogloss was characterized by orthographic, solved correctly, and negative feedback LREs, the jigsaw was characterized by unresolved LREs. The results are discussed in light of the arguments about the effects of limited information-processing capacity on task performance (). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Robert J. Blake,et al.  Computer Mediated Communication: A Window on L2 Spanish Interlanguage , 2000 .

[2]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Developing L2 Oral Proficiency Through Synchronous CMC: Output, Working Memory, and Interlanguage Development. , 2013 .

[3]  Peter Skehan,et al.  Cognition and Second Language Instruction: Cognition and tasks , 2001 .

[4]  T. Pica,et al.  INFORMATION GAP TASKS: Their Multiple Roles and Contributions to Interaction Research Methodology , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[5]  Bryan Smith.  Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .

[6]  N. Storch.  Comparing Second Language Learners' Attention to Form Across Tasks , 1998 .

[7]  Evangeline Marlos Varonis,et al.  Variation in Native Speaker Speech Modification to Non-Native Speakers , 1985, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[8]  Jill Pellettieri,et al.  Network-based Language Teaching: Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence , 2000 .

[9]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Classroom Interaction, Comprehension, and the Acquisition of L2 Word Meanings , 1994 .

[10]  Dorothy M. Chun.  Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence , 1994 .

[11]  Rod Ellis,et al.  THE ROLES OF MODIFIED INPUT AND OUTPUT IN THE INCIDENTAL ACQUISITION OF WORD MEANINGS , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[12]  María José de la Fuente.  NEGOTIATION AND ORAL ACQUISITION OF L2 VOCABULARY , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[13]  R. Lyster.  Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms , 1998 .

[14]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Immersion Education: From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? , 1997 .

[15]  S. Gass,et al.  Task-Based Interactions in Classroom and Laboratory Settings. , 2005 .

[16]  Michael H. Long.  Linguistic and Conversational Adjustments to Non-Native Speakers , 1983, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  Bryan Smith.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED NEGOTIATED INTERACTION AND LEXICAL ACQUISITION , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[18]  L. Waite,et al.  Nonfamily Living and the Erosion of Traditional Family Orientations Among Young Adults , 1986 .

[19]  How Does Group Discussion in Reconstruction Tasks Affect Written Language Output? , 2005 .

[20]  Susana M. Sotillo.  Discourse Functions and Syntactic Complexity in Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication , 2000 .

[21]  María José de la Fuente.  Is SLA Interactionist Theory Relevant to CALL? A Study on the Effects of Computer-Mediated Interaction in L2 Vocabulary Acquisition , 2003 .

[22]  Michael H. Long.  Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1 , 1983 .

[23]  Rhonda Oliver,et al.  The Patterns of Negotiation for Meaning in Child Interactions , 2002 .

[24]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Comparing Esl Learners' Attention To Grammar On Three Different Classroom Tasks , 2001 .

[25]  M. Swain,et al.  Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness1 , 1994 .

[26]  J. Norris,et al.  Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta‐analysis , 2000 .

[27]  Guy Aston,et al.  TROUBLE-SHOOTING IN INTERACTION WITH LEARNERS: THE MORE THE MERRIER? , 1986 .

[28]  Richard G. Kern.  Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production , 1995 .

[29]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work , 2002 .

[30]  Bryan Smith,et al.  Methodological Hurdles in Capturing CMC Data: The Case of the Missing Self-Repair. , 2008 .

[31]  Keiko Kitade,et al.  L2 Learners' Discourse and SLA Theories in CMC: Collaborative Interaction in Internet Chat , 2000 .

[32]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[33]  Alison Mackey,et al.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[34]  Shinichi Izumi.  OUTPUT, INPUT ENHANCEMENT, AND THE NOTICING HYPOTHESIS , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[35]  P. Robinson.  Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework , 2001 .

[36]  Michael J. Leeser.  Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue , 2004 .

[37]  Junko Iwasaki,et al.  Chat-Line interaction and negative feedback , 2003 .

[38]  R. Ellis,et al.  Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition , 1993 .

[39]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, Interaction, and Second Language Production , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[40]  Marisol Fernández-García,et al.  Learners’ interactions: a comparison of oral and computer-assisted written conversations , 2003, ReCALL.

[41]  Lourdes Ortega,et al.  Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion , 1997 .

[42]  Robert J. Blake,et al.  Who's Helping Whom?: Learner/Heritage‐Speakers' Networked Discussions in Spanish , 2003 .

[43]  Frank A. Morris,et al.  Child-to-Child Interaction and Corrective Feedback in a Computer Mediated L2 Class , 2005 .

[44]  Margaret Healey Beauvois.  Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion in the Foreign Language Classroom: Conversation in Slow Motion , 1992 .

[45]  Nancy Sullivan,et al.  A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom , 1996 .

[46]  M. Warschauer.  Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[47]  R. Ellis.  Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused Instruction , 2001 .

[48]  T. Pica.  Questions From the Language Classroom: Research Perspectives , 1994 .

[49]  Merril Swain,et al.  Collaborative dialogue: its contribution to second language learning , 1997 .

[50]  T. Pica.  Second-language Acquisition, Social Interaction, and the Classroom. , 1987 .

[51]  M. Mayo.  The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy , 2002 .

[52]  Vincenza Tudini,et al.  Using Native Speakers in Chat , 2003 .

[53]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Reformulation and the Learning of French Pronominal Verbs in a Canadian French Immersion Context. , 2002 .

[54]  G. Crookes.  Planning and Interlanguage Variation , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[55]  T. Pica,et al.  "Information Gap" Tasks: Do They Facilitate Second Language Acquisition? , 1986 .

[56]  Jessica Williams.  The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form , 2001 .

[57]  N. Spada.  Form-Focussed Instruction and Second Language Acquisition: A Review of Classroom and Laboratory Research , 1997, Language Teaching.

[58]  B. Vanpatten.  Attending to Form and Content in the Input , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[59]  T. Pica,et al.  Comprehensible Output as an Outcome of Linguistic Demands on the Learner , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[60]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[61]  S. Loewen.  INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[62]  Lina Lee,et al.  Synchronous online exchanges: a study of modification devices on non-native discourse , 2002 .

[63]  Jessica Williams.  Learner-Generated Attention to Form. , 1999 .

[64]  S. Loewen,et al.  Recasts in the Adult English L2 Classroom: Characteristics, Explicitness, and Effectiveness , 2006 .

[65]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Noticing and Text-Based Chat , 2006 .

[66]  Alison Mackey,et al.  The Role of Input and Interaction in Second Language Acquisition Introduction to the Special Issue , 1998 .

[67]  M. Swain,et al.  Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together , 1998 .

[68]  Michael H. Long.  Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology , 1991 .

[69]  Margaret Healey Beauvois.  Conversations in Slow Motion: Computer-Mediated Communication in the Foreign Language Classroom. , 1998 .

[70]  R. Ellis,et al.  Disentangling Focus on Form. A Response to Sheen and O'Neill (2005) , 2006 .

[71]  L. Ortega.  PLANNING AND FOCUS ON FORM IN L2 ORAL PERFORMANCE , 1999, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[72]  Markus Kötter,et al.  Negotiation of Meaning and Codeswitching in Online Tandems , 2003 .

[73]  Etsuko Toyoda,et al.  Categorization of Text Chat Communication between Learners and Native Speakers of Japanese. , 2002 .

[74]  T. Pica.  Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal about Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes?. , 1994 .

[75]  Bryan Smith,et al.  Synchronous computer mediated communication captured by usability lab technologies: new interpretations , 2004 .

[76]  Michael H. Long.  Task, Group, and Task-Group Interactions. , 1990 .