Adoption Patterns and Attitudinal Development in Computer-Supported Meetings: An Exploratory Study with SAMM

Abstract:To permit exploration of the development of attitudes in a group decision support system environment, eight groups of four and five persons each met in a computer-supported conference room over a period of two months. Each group addressed two strategic planning tasks, meeting for a total of eight two-hour sessions. The computer support provided was Software-Aided Meeting Management (SAMM),2 a system designed to support common group needs such as problem identification, alternatives generation, and alternatives evaluation. Groups were permitted to use or not use SAMM, according to their own perceived needs. Members’ attitudes toward the group decision process and their perceptions of meeting quality were assessed after each meeting. As part of an academic course in which they were enrolled, the groups were required to submit a detailed report of their plans for each task; the plans were evaluated by the course instructor. Results suggested two patterns of adoption of SAMM: (1) groups that accepted...

[1]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience at IBM with group support systems: A field study , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[3]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[4]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[5]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[6]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  COMPUTER-SUPPORTED MEETINGS: BUILDING A RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT. , 1988 .

[8]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[9]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  Invited Article: A Framework for the Development of Decisoin Support Systems , 1980, MIS Q..

[10]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[11]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision‐making discussions , 1978 .

[12]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[13]  Paul Gray,et al.  Group decision support systems , 1987, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  George P. Huber,et al.  Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems , 1984, MIS Q..

[15]  Randall Steeb,et al.  A Computer-Based Interactive System for Group Decisionmaking , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation , 1978, MIS Q..

[17]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[18]  Robert C. Joyner,et al.  Computer Augmented Organizational Problem Solving , 1970 .

[19]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[20]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[21]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Group Confidence Pressures in Iterative Decisions , 1982 .

[23]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..