Oddity performance in preschool children at risk for mental retardation: transfer and maintenance.

The oddity performance of five preschool children at risk for mental retardation was facilitated by increasing the number of nonodd elements in a visual array. A combination intrasubject reversal and multiple baseline across subjects design indicated the internal validity of interventions designed to enhance the perceptual salience and consequent stimulus control of the odd stimulus. Results demonstrate that transfer and maintenance of oddity learning can be obtained even with individuals for whom correct oddity responding is uncommon. The typically poor performance of young and developmentally delayed children as compared to nondelayed children on tasks such as the oddity task may be attributable to a lower sensitivity to relational information.

[1]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Memory scanning by children: Meaningfulness and mediation , 1977 .

[2]  D. Lane,et al.  A Rule-based Theory of Intermediate-Size Transposition. , 1977 .

[3]  T. Nettelbeck,et al.  Studies of Mild Mental Retardation and Timed Performance , 1981 .

[4]  N. R. Ellis,et al.  Oddity learning as a function of mental age. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  Thomas R. Kratochwill,et al.  Single Subject Research: Strategies for Evaluating Change , 1978 .

[6]  M. E. Stella,et al.  Stimulus control of eye orientations: Shaping S+ only versus shaping S- only☆ , 1986 .

[7]  A. L. Brown,et al.  Transfer between the oddity and relative size concepts: reversal and extradimensional shifts. , 1972, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  E. S. Gollin,et al.  Perceptual distinctiveness and oddity-problem solving in children. , 1967, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  M. Kneale,et al.  The Sensory Order , 1954 .

[10]  D. Greenfield Facilitating mentally retarded children's relational learning through novelty-familiarity training. , 1985, American journal of mental deficiency.

[11]  R. Malott Rule-governed behavior, self-management, and the developmentally disabled: A theoretical analysis , 1984 .

[12]  D. Barlow,et al.  Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change , 1976 .

[13]  J. Dinsmoor The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  S. Soraci,et al.  An Automated Research and Training System for Child-Clinical Populations , 1984 .

[15]  M. Scott,et al.  Repetition of cues in children's oddity learning and transfer , 1978 .

[16]  L. Stoddard,et al.  An observation on stimulus control in a tilt discrimination by children. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  A. L. Brown,et al.  Children's discrimination learning based on identity or difference. , 1974, Advances in child development and behavior.

[18]  E. Hearst,et al.  Oddity learning in the pigeon as a function of the number of incorrect alternatives. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  C. W. Deckner,et al.  Autoshaping of abnormal children , 1980, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[20]  E. S. Gollin,et al.  Relational learning and transfer by young children , 1972 .