Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students.

THE STUDY INVESTIGATES ninth-grade students' use of a reading strategy (the structure strategy) which focuses on following the organizational structure of text in order to determine what is important to remember. Texts read were well organized with problem/solution or comparison structures; signaling varied the saliency of these structures. Signaling effects were expected to interact with mastery of the structure strategy. Regardless of signaling, good comprehenders on the Stanford Achievement Test were expected to follow the structure strategy while poor comprehenders were not. However, comprehension underachievers (vocabulary substantially above comprehension test scores) were expected to follow the structure strategy only when signaling was present. Most predictions were supported; the structure strategy appeared to be a particularly effective retrieval mneumonic. Its development with age across different discourse types is discussed. Also characterized is the approach to reading and retelling of ninthgrade students who do not employ this structure strategy.

[1]  Emerald V. Dechant.  Improving the teaching of reading , 1964 .

[2]  M. Halliday.  NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[3]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[4]  Robert F. Simmons,et al.  A semantic analyzer for English sentences , 1968, Mech. Transl. Comput. Linguistics.

[5]  G. Bower,et al.  Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized word lists , 1969 .

[6]  Lawrence T. Frase,et al.  Paragraph Organization of Written Materials: The Influence of Conceptual Clustering Upon the Level and Organization of Recall. , 1969 .

[7]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .

[8]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The abstraction of linguistic ideas , 1971 .

[9]  Richard C. Anderson.  How to Construct Achievement Tests to Assess Comprehension , 1972 .

[10]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[11]  G W McConkie,et al.  What is recalled after hearing a passage? , 1973, Journal of educational psychology.

[12]  W. Kintsch.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .

[13]  B. Meyer.  Identification of the Structure of prose and Its Implications for the Study of Reading and Memorya , 1975 .

[14]  B. Meyer.  The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[15]  Carl H. Frederiksen,et al.  Acquisition of semantic information from discourse: Effects of repeated exposures , 1975 .

[16]  Carl H Frederiksen,et al.  Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[18]  Sandra S. Smiley,et al.  Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation , 1977 .

[19]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[20]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[21]  Nancy Marshall,et al.  Comprehension of connected discourse: a study into the relationships between the structure of text and information recalled* , 1978 .

[22]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  The development of strategies for studying texts. , 1978 .

[23]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge , 1978 .

[24]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory , 1979 .

[25]  R. Freedle.  New directions in discourse processing , 1980 .

[26]  L. Reder.  The Role of Elaboration in the Comprehension and Retention of Prose: A Critical Review , 1980 .

[27]  Barbara M. Taylor,et al.  Children's Memory for Expository Text after Reading. , 1980 .