Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System

Improving Whole-Genome Screens Improved methods are needed for the knockout of individual genes in genome-scale functional screens. Wang et al. (p. 80, published online 12 December) and Shalem et al. (p. 84, published online 12 December) used the bacterial CRISPR/Cas9 system to power-screen protocols that avoid several of the pitfalls associated with small interfering RNA (siRNA) screens. Genome editing by these methods completely disrupts target genes, thus avoiding weak signals that can occur when transcript abundance is partially decreased by siRNA. Furthermore, gene targeting by the CRISPR system is more precise and appears to produce substantially fewer off-target effects than existing methods. Genome-editing technology allows improved positive or negative selection screens. The bacterial clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–Cas9 system for genome editing has greatly expanded the toolbox for mammalian genetics, enabling the rapid generation of isogenic cell lines and mice with modified alleles. Here, we describe a pooled, loss-of-function genetic screening approach suitable for both positive and negative selection that uses a genome-scale lentiviral single-guide RNA (sgRNA) library. sgRNA expression cassettes were stably integrated into the genome, which enabled a complex mutant pool to be tracked by massively parallel sequencing. We used a library containing 73,000 sgRNAs to generate knockout collections and performed screens in two human cell lines. A screen for resistance to the nucleotide analog 6-thioguanine identified all expected members of the DNA mismatch repair pathway, whereas another for the DNA topoisomerase II (TOP2A) poison etoposide identified TOP2A, as expected, and also cyclin-dependent kinase 6, CDK6. A negative selection screen for essential genes identified numerous gene sets corresponding to fundamental processes. Last, we show that sgRNA efficiency is associated with specific sequence motifs, enabling the prediction of more effective sgRNAs. Collectively, these results establish Cas9/sgRNA screens as a powerful tool for systematic genetic analysis in mammalian cells.

[1]  J. Gerring.  A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[2]  A. Fire,et al.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1998, Nature.

[3]  G. Rubin,et al.  The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. , 1999, Genetics.

[4]  J. Ashby.  References and Notes , 1999 .

[5]  G. Marsischky,et al.  Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  R. Bernards,et al.  A System for Stable Expression of Short Interfering RNAs in Mammalian Cells , 2002, Science.

[7]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[8]  T. Kinsella,et al.  DNA mismatch repair (MMR) mediates 6-thioguanine genotoxicity by introducing single-strand breaks to signal a G2-M arrest in MMR-proficient RKO cells. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[9]  M. Andreeff,et al.  Changes associated with the development of resistance to imatinib (STI571) in two leukemia cell lines expressing p210 Bcr/Abl protein , 2004, Cancer.

[10]  Nancy Hopkins,et al.  Identification of 315 genes essential for early zebrafish development. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  David E Hill,et al.  Toward improving Caenorhabditis elegans phenome mapping with an ORFeome-based RNAi library. , 2004, Genome research.

[12]  A. Bradley,et al.  Mismatch repair genes identified using genetic screens in Blm-deficient embryonic stem cells , 2004, Nature.

[13]  A. Coulson,et al.  Full-genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2005, Nature.

[14]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Nir Hacohen,et al.  Minimizing the risk of reporting false positives in large-scale RNAi screens , 2006, Nature Methods.

[16]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  A Lentiviral RNAi Library for Human and Mouse Genes Applied to an Arrayed Viral High-Content Screen , 2006, Cell.

[17]  Liming Yang,et al.  A loss-of-function RNA interference screen for molecular targets in cancer , 2006, Nature.

[18]  H. Yang-Yen,et al.  A knockout mouse approach reveals that TCTP functions as an essential factor for cell proliferation and survival in a tissue- or cell type-specific manner. , 2007, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes , 2007, Science.

[20]  C. Mathé,et al.  The THAP-zinc finger protein THAP1 regulates endothelial cell proliferation through modulation of pRB/E2F cell-cycle target genes. , 2007, Blood.

[21]  W. Richard McCombie,et al.  Topoisomerase levels determine chemotherapy response in vitro and in vivo , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Emmanouil T Dermitzakis,et al.  Large-Scale Population Study of Human Cell Lines Indicates that Dosage Compensation Is Virtually Complete , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[23]  Doris Chen,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of Notch signalling in Drosophila by transgenic RNAi , 2009, Nature.

[24]  Carla P. Guimarães,et al.  Haploid Genetic Screens in Human Cells Identify Host Factors Used by Pathogens , 2009, Science.

[25]  Anastasia A Samsonova,et al.  False negative rates in Drosophila cell-based RNAi screens: a case study , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[26]  Gary D Bader,et al.  The Genetic Landscape of a Cell , 2010, Science.

[27]  D. Ferguson,et al.  Codanin-1 mutations in congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type 1 affect HP1{alpha} localization in erythroblasts. , 2010, Blood.

[28]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Systematic investigation of genetic vulnerabilities across cancer cell lines reveals lineage-specific dependencies in ovarian cancer , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Jie He,et al.  Identification and characterization of a novel gene, c1orf109, encoding a CK2 substrate that is involved in cancer cell proliferation , 2012, Journal of Biomedical Science.

[30]  Shifeng Xue,et al.  Specialized ribosomes: a new frontier in gene regulation and organismal biology , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  M. Mizoguchi,et al.  Complex DNA repair pathways as possible therapeutic targets to overcome temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma , 2012, Front. Oncol..

[32]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[33]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[34]  W. Kaelin,et al.  Use and Abuse of RNAi to Study Mammalian Gene Function , 2012, Science.

[35]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[37]  David R. Liu,et al.  High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  David A. Scott,et al.  Double Nicking by RNA-Guided CRISPR Cas9 for Enhanced Genome Editing Specificity , 2013, Cell.

[39]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[40]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  Efficient In Vivo Genome Editing Using RNA-Guided Nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  E. Lander,et al.  The Xist lncRNA Exploits Three-Dimensional Genome Architecture to Spread Across the X Chromosome , 2013, Science.

[42]  G. Church,et al.  CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[44]  M. Kimura,et al.  Generation of an ICF Syndrome Model by Efficient Genome Editing of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using the CRISPR System , 2013, International journal of molecular sciences.

[45]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.