Implementation of a Curriculum-Integrated Computer Game for Introducing Scientific Argumentation

Argumentation has been emphasized in recent US science education reform efforts (NGSS Lead States 2013; NRC 2012), and while existing studies have investigated approaches to introducing and supporting argumentation (e.g., McNeill and Krajcik in Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78, 2008; Kang et al. in Science Education, 98(4), 674–704, 2014), few studies have investigated how game-based approaches may be used to introduce argumentation to students. In this paper, we report findings from a design-based study of a teacher’s use of a computer game intended to introduce the claim, evidence, reasoning (CER) framework (McNeill and Krajcik 2012) for scientific argumentation. We studied the implementation of the game over two iterations of development in a high school biology teacher’s classes. The results of this study include aspects of enactment of the activities and student argument scores. We found the teacher used the game in aspects of explicit instruction of argumentation during both iterations, although the ways in which the game was used differed. Also, students’ scores in the second iteration were significantly higher than the first iteration. These findings support the notion that students can learn argumentation through a game, especially when used in conjunction with explicit instruction and support in student materials. These findings also highlight the importance of analyzing classroom implementation in studies of game-based learning.

[1]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[2]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Teachers' implementation of a game-based biotechnology curriculum , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[3]  R. Khishfe.  Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer , 2014 .

[4]  W. Penuel,et al.  Organizing Research and Development at the Intersection of Learning, Implementation, and Design , 2011 .

[5]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[6]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[7]  S. Barab,et al.  Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play , 2007 .

[8]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .

[9]  Hosun Kang,et al.  Creating Opportunities for Students to Show What They Know: The Role of Scaffolding in Assessment Tasks - eScholarship , 2014 .

[10]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[11]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students' prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science , 2008 .

[12]  J. C. Bunch,et al.  Agriscience Teachers’ Implementation of Digital Game-based Learning in an Introductory Animal Science Course , 2015 .

[13]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Teaching and learning science as argument , 2010 .

[14]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? , 2011 .

[15]  J. Osborne,et al.  Authors' response to “For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson” by Berland and McNeill , 2012 .

[16]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of Teachers' Instructional Practices on Student Learning. , 2008 .

[17]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Teacher Practices that Support Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations in Middle School Classrooms , 2004, ICLS.

[18]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson† , 2012 .

[19]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy , 2008 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Designing for real-world scientific inquiry in virtual environments , 2010 .

[22]  William L. Romine,et al.  Learning Biology Through Innovative Curricula: A Comparison of Game- and Nongame-Based Approaches , 2015 .

[23]  Anne M. Poliquin,et al.  Role of Epistemic Beliefs and Scientific Argumentation in Science Learning , 2008 .

[24]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[25]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design , 2002 .

[26]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Role playing games for scientific citizenship , 2012, Cultural Studies of Science Education.

[27]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts , 2010 .

[28]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[29]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .

[30]  P. S. Çetin,et al.  Explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills , 2014 .

[31]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[32]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[33]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Game-Based Learning in Science Education: A Review of Relevant Research , 2013 .

[34]  William R. Watson,et al.  A case study of the in-class use of a video game for teaching high school history , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[35]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[36]  D. Kuhn.  Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[37]  R. Peterson.  Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science , 2012 .

[38]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[39]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[40]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[41]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .