Changing perspectives on the organizational consequences of information technology

Early predictions of the impact of computers on organizations ranged from 'human - computer symbiosis' to automation and the collapse of jobs. The findings from impact research show that there was evidence for all predictions that were made. This demonstrated that the technology is very flexible and can be deployed to facilitate many different organizational outcomes. However, more recent research shows that the design processdespite significant progress in the adoption of user-centred methodsremains technocentric and organizational outcomes are often unplanned and unwanted. The paper concludes that current predictions about the development of virtual organizations are likely to be over simplistic and that the usage of methods to assess organizational options and design socio-technical systems are necessary if emerging forms of technology are to be effectively deployed.

[1]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  A New Theory of Innovation , 1998 .

[2]  K. Eason,et al.  Representing socio-technical systems options in the development of new forms of work organization , 1996 .

[3]  Michael Frese,et al.  Don't underestimate the problems of user centredness in software development projectsthere are many! , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  User participation in context: a case study in a UK bank , 1992 .

[5]  W. Wayt Gibbs,et al.  Software's Chronic Crisis , 1994 .

[6]  H. Braverman.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[7]  Ken Eason,et al.  Early Evaluation of the Organisational Implications of CSCW Systems , 1996 .

[8]  A. Cherns.  Principles of Socio-Technical Design , 1993 .

[9]  Douglas C. Engelbart,et al.  Toward augmenting the human intellect and boosting our collective IQ , 1995, CACM.

[10]  JOHN STRAIN,et al.  Exploring the implications of allocation of function for human resource management in the Royal Navy , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  J. Schiller.  SECURE DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING , 1994 .

[12]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[13]  R. Jacoby.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1976, Telos.

[14]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Planning and knowledge about strategies: Their relationship to work characteristics in software design , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  User involvement in the systems design process-a practical guide for users , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Ken Eason,et al.  The use and usefulness of functions in electronic journals: the experience of the SuperJournal Project , 2000 .

[17]  K. Eason.  Information Technology and Organizational Change , 1989 .

[18]  K. Eason,et al.  Gaining User and Organisational Acceptance for Advanced Information Systems , 1993 .

[19]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Human and organizational issues in information systems development , 1992 .

[20]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Sociotechnical issues in the implementation of imaging technology , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Andy Smith,et al.  Human factors in software development - current practice relating to user centred design in the UK , 1995, INTERACT.

[22]  Ken Eason,et al.  Understanding the Organisational Ramifications of Implementing Information Technology Systems , 1997 .

[23]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  The consideration of organizational issues during the systems development process: An empirical analysis , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  The Principles of Sociotechnical Design , 1976 .

[25]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Becoming social: Expanding scenario-based approaches in HCI , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[27]  Barrie Sherman,et al.  The collapse of work , 1979 .

[28]  Jenny Owen,et al.  Job design within a human centred (system) design framework , 1992 .