The role of prototypes in communication between stakeholders

Prototypes are complex and dynamic artifacts that shape social situations during product development. A ten-month applied ethnographic study of a footwear company recounts prototypes' evolving role in communication between three stakeholder groups. In this case study, we use Mol's “bodies multiple” theory to describe prototypes enactment as communication tools across contexts. This study finds that prototypes become encoded with information that is translated, decoded, and re-encoded by stakeholder groups. Prototypes remain the same across contexts, yet the spokesperson guiding the prototype may change. Raising awareness of prototypes role in communication, such as their ability to build confidence through socialization, can allow design teams to better plan for how information is encoded into the prototyped artifact and the messaging surrounding it.

[1]  Theodore Zamenopoulos,et al.  Design as a social process: A complex systems perspective , 2008 .

[2]  Kathryn Henderson.  The Political Career of a Prototype: Visual Representation in Design Engineering , 1995 .

[3]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Shadowing: And Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies , 2007 .

[4]  Frido Smulders,et al.  Surprises are the benefits: reframing in multidisciplinary design teams , 2016 .

[5]  Carlye Lauff,et al.  What is a Prototype? What are the Roles of Prototypes in Companies? , 2018 .

[6]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education , 1998 .

[7]  Michael Deininger,et al.  Novice designers' use of prototypes in engineering design. , 2017, Design studies.

[8]  Martin Steinert,et al.  Dancing with ambiguity: Causality behavior, design thinking, and triple-loop-learning , 2011, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[9]  Martin Steinert,et al.  Eliciting unknown unknowns with prototypes: Introducing prototrials and prototrial-driven cultures , 2017 .

[10]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[11]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[12]  Peter J. Coughlan,et al.  Prototypes as (Design) Tools for Behavioral and Organizational Change , 2007 .

[13]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[14]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Between thought and object in engineering design , 2002 .

[15]  Dominique Vinck,et al.  Everyday Engineering. An ethnography of Design and Innovation , 2003 .

[16]  Sabine Junginger,et al.  Product Development as a Vehicle for Organizational Change , 2008, Design Issues.

[17]  Annemarie Mol,et al.  Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: the Example of Hypoglycaemia , 2004 .

[18]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[19]  Kathy Charmaz,et al.  Grounded Theory in Ethnography , 2001 .

[20]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge-Building , 2000 .

[21]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[22]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[24]  Dominique Vinck,et al.  Taking intermediary objects and equipping work into account in the study of engineering practices , 2011 .

[25]  Eugene S. Ferguson,et al.  Engineering and the Mind's Eye , 1994 .

[26]  D. Rennie.  Grounded Theory Methodology , 1998 .

[27]  Carlye Lauff,et al.  Perceptions of Prototypes: Pilot Study Comparing Students and Professionals , 2017 .

[28]  Carlye Anne Lauff,et al.  Prototyping in the Wild: the Role of Prototypes in Companies , 2018 .

[29]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[30]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[31]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[32]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Discovering the future of the case study method in evaluation research , 1994 .

[33]  P. Trompette,et al.  Revisiting the notion of Boundary Object , 2009 .

[34]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  A study of prototypes, design activity, and design outcome , 2005 .

[35]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[36]  E. Gerber,et al.  The psychological experience of prototyping , 2012 .

[37]  Ashwin Michaelraj,et al.  Taxonomy of physical prototypes: structure and validation , 2009 .

[38]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  An ethnographic perspective on engineering design , 1988 .